Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Add\s+C99\s+initializers\s+to\s+ethtool\.c\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Add\s+C99\s+initializers\s+to\s+ethtool\.c\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] Add C99 initializers to ethtool.c (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:16:33 -0600; Here's a little patch adding C99 initializers to ethtool.c. The patch is against the current BK, and the file has been recompiled with the changes successfully. This patch and the one I just sent fo; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00457.html (10,692 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] Add C99 initializers to ethtool.c (score: 1): Author: t@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:24:54 -0500; Here's a little patch adding C99 initializers to ethtool.c. The patch is against the current BK, and the file has been recompiled with the changes successfully. This patch and the one I just sent for; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00498.html (8,871 bytes)
3. [PATCH] Add C99 initializers to ethtool.c (score: 1): Author: "Art Haas" <ahaas@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 18:16:33 -0600; Hi. Here's a little patch adding C99 initializers to ethtool.c. The patch is against the current BK, and the file has been recompiled with the changes successfully. This patch and the one I just sent; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg01198.html (10,692 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] Add C99 initializers to ethtool.c (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:24:54 -0500; Here's a little patch adding C99 initializers to ethtool.c. The patch is against the current BK, and the file has been recompiled with the changes successfully. This patch and the one I just sent for; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg01239.html (9,013 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]