Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Add\s+32bit\s+emulation\s+for\s+wireless\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Add\s+32bit\s+emulation\s+for\s+wireless\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: er <c-d.hailfinger.kernel.2003@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:33:43 +0100; [First version of this mail seems to have gotten lost. Apologies if you see it twice] Some distributions call iwconfig at every bootup and I was sick of seeing all the unimplemented ioctl messages on; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00385.html (15,520 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:39:45 +0000; What about register_ioctl32_conversion() from the wireless code to avoid exposing it?; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00386.html (8,836 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:10:41 +0100; At least for net/* stuff it seems to be standard to do it in the central file. All other networking ioctls are implemented this way too. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00388.html (9,233 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 05:56:15 -0800; Andi please see the current 2.6.x BK tree, I already put in preliminary work in this area.; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00389.html (9,108 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: sri@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:39:19 +0100; Went it in after 2.6.1? 2.6.1 definitely spews out warnings for it at every boot, that is why I did this. If it's already fixed that's fine for me of course. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00390.html (9,645 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: een <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 06:39:21 -0800; Yes, Linus sucked it in like 10 hours ago, about 4 hours right before you made your initial posting on this thread.; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00391.html (9,630 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: wig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:54:12 +0100; Oh, I actually posted it yesterday but due a broken MTA it didn't go out @) But I didn't check BK anyways so it would not have made much difference. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00392.html (10,051 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: avid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:49:43 -0800; I'm glad that you found the ioctl description table useful, the code look neat and simple. When I did redesign the driver API in WE-13, ioctl emulation for 64 bits was definitely on my mind (thanks t; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00399.html (13,213 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: f Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:01:32 +0100; I don't use wireless at all[1] - I was just annoyed at the storm of unimplemented ioctl messages when booting up 32bit userland. SuSE 9.0 boot up calls iwconfig by default. [1] I actually have a Sams; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00401.html (11,411 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:19:12 -0800; I was wondering, because Samsungs cards should be supported by the HostAP driver (which remind me, HostAP needs to go in the kernel). This analogy doesn't work. If your network is wireless, you won't; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00403.html (12,569 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: s <jt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:35:01 +0100; It apparently works with David Hinds' PCMCIA kit, but that is far too messy to patch into a changing development kernel all the time. The main problem seems to be the missing bridge support in the ke; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00405.html (12,436 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:26:57 -0800; I think the situation is different. On several 64-bit platforms we encourage using 32-bit compilation and binaries by default because: 1) they're a lot faster than their 64-bit counterparts 2) they'r; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00406.html (11,193 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:40:27 -0800; I think I've done my part, the wireless ioctls were clearly not the most difficult to convert ;-) Jean; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00407.html (10,842 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 21:50:16 +0100; Just for the record: this doesn't apply to AMD64. While data structures take a bit more memory at runtime the 64bit code is a lot better due to more registers and better ABI. And it is also not sign; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00408.html (10,889 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:51:00 -0800; I see you have it covered : http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.1/0469.html You may want to get in touch with Dominik Brodowski and Russell King, because the i82365 driver in 2.6.X is; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg00409.html (12,116 bytes)
16. [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 13:33:43 +0100; [First version of this mail seems to have gotten lost. Apologies if you see it twice] Some distributions call iwconfig at every bootup and I was sick of seeing all the unimplemented ioctl messages on; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01093.html (15,520 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:39:45 +0000; What about register_ioctl32_conversion() from the wireless code to avoid exposing it?; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01094.html (8,934 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:10:41 +0100; At least for net/* stuff it seems to be standard to do it in the central file. All other networking ioctls are implemented this way too. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01096.html (9,321 bytes)
19. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 05:56:15 -0800; Andi please see the current 2.6.x BK tree, I already put in preliminary work in this area.; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01097.html (9,235 bytes)
20. Re: [PATCH] Add 32bit emulation for wireless (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:39:19 +0100; Went it in after 2.6.1? 2.6.1 definitely spews out warnings for it at every boot, that is why I did this. If it's already fixed that's fine for me of course. -Andi; /archives/netdev/2004-01/msg01098.html (9,812 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]