Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\:\s+r8169\:\s+Message\s+level\s+support\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\:\s+r8169\:\s+Message\s+level\s+support\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support (score: 1): Author: ering <olh@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:11:02 +0000; The attached patch against 2.6.11-rc5 adds support for setting the message level, which controls which messages are actually printk()'d. Changes: * A module option "debug". This option is a bitfield; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00931.html (30,785 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:35:18 +0100; Jeff, can you send a ack/nack if you disagree with the remarks below ? Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] They do not offer exactly the same range. I prefer to keep both as the module o; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00932.html (15,325 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:20:43 -0500; Francois Romieu wrote: Jeff, can you send a ack/nack if you disagree with the remarks below ? Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] There seems to be a mixture of drivers using a bitfield; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00933.html (9,702 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support (score: 1): Author: k@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:43:01 +0000; Thanks for reviewing the patch, Francois and Jeff. I'll send an updated version sometime in the next week. Francois Romieu wrote: Jeff, can you send a ack/nack if you disagree with the remarks below; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00952.html (17,381 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:52:10 +0100; Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : Fine. [...] They were split when they could not fit on a single line. OTOH I did not hunt them when they were already there. [...] Your. I would put the sma; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00957.html (9,812 bytes)
6. [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:11:02 +0000; Hello. The attached patch against 2.6.11-rc5 adds support for setting the message level, which controls which messages are actually printk()'d. Changes: * A module option "debug". This option is a bi; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01951.html (30,814 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:35:18 +0100; Jeff, can you send a ack/nack if you disagree with the remarks below ? Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] They do not offer exactly the same range. I prefer to keep both as the module o; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01952.html (15,373 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:20:43 -0500; Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] There seems to be a mixture of drivers using a bitfield and a level. Which is the currently preferred mechanism? They do not offer exactly the same ra; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01953.html (9,798 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support (score: 1): Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:43:01 +0000; Hello. Thanks for reviewing the patch, Francois and Jeff. I'll send an updated version sometime in the next week. Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] There seems to be a mixture of drive; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01972.html (17,292 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH]: r8169: Message level support (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:52:10 +0100; Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] Fine. [...] They were split when they could not fit on a single line. OTOH I did not hunt them when they were already there. [...] Your. I would put t; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01977.html (9,914 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]