Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\:\s+fixed\s+typo\s+of\s+reassembly\.c\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH]: fixed typo of reassembly.c (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:19:23 -0700
It is textual fix only, do you realize this? Both ntohs() and htons() perform the same transformation on a 16-bit data item. It really does not matter which one you actually use, in practice. I will
/archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00024.html (7,810 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH]: fixed typo of reassembly.c (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:02:22 +1000
It might make a difference in future if the sparse people decide to annotate its arguments/return values. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxx
/archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00034.html (8,302 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH]: fixed typo of reassembly.c (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:38:32 -0700
That's true. Al Viro has done this on the filesystems and "cpu_to_{be,le}{16,32,64}()" et al. interfaces. I'm sure he'll hit the networking before long.
/archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00035.html (8,302 bytes)

4. [PATCH]: fixed typo of reassembly.c (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:23:26 +0900 (JST)
e kicked off
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg01426.html (7,525 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH]: fixed typo of reassembly.c (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:19:23 -0700
It is textual fix only, do you realize this? Both ntohs() and htons() perform the same transformation on a 16-bit data item. It really does not matter which one you actually use, in practice. I will
/archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01522.html (7,936 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH]: fixed typo of reassembly.c (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:02:22 +1000
It might make a difference in future if the sparse people decide to annotate its arguments/return values. -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxx
/archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01532.html (8,384 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH]: fixed typo of reassembly.c (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:38:32 -0700
That's true. Al Viro has done this on the filesystems and "cpu_to_{be,le}{16,32,64}()" et al. interfaces. I'm sure he'll hit the networking before long.
/archives/netdev/2004-10/msg01533.html (8,389 bytes)

8. [PATCH]: fixed typo of reassembly.c (score: 1)
Author: Yasuyuki Kozakai <yasuyuki.kozakai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:23:26 +0900 (JST)
Hi, This patch fixes byte ordering. Please apply this. Signed-off-by: Yasuyuki KOZAKAI <yasuyuki.kozakai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, diff -X dontdiff -Nurp linux-2.6.9-rc3/net/ipv6/reassembly.c linux-2.6
/archives/netdev/2004-09/msg02882.html (7,525 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu