Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\[IPv6\]\s+separation\s+xfrm_lookup\s+from\s+ip6_dst_lookup\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:51:35 -0700
I agree, and let's defer this patch until we resolve that. It is simple to fix, I think.
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00015.html (9,466 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:41:47 +1000
Thanks for the patch. This raises an interesting question. Is it really correct to look at the first hop address when doing the route lookup? The problem is that if we use the first-hop address as th
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00016.html (10,585 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:09:14 -0700
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00050.html (10,957 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 01:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00054.html (10,559 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: oshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 02:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00055.html (10,668 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: 明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:21:10 +0900
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00056.html (11,694 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: iyazawa <kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:55:20 +1000
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00057.html (10,915 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: lnut@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:35:20 -0700
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00205.html (11,009 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: HIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:38:30 +0900 (JST)
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00215.html (10,309 bytes)

10. [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: Cheng Jin <chengjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:12:05 +0900
This patch separates xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup to support srcrt correctly. ip6_dst_lookup should be called with next hop. however xfrm_lookup should be called with final destination. It fixes
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00763.html (21,748 bytes)

11. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:51:35 -0700
I agree, and let's defer this patch until we resolve that. It is simple to fix, I think.
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00906.html (9,602 bytes)

12. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:41:47 +1000
Thanks for the patch. This raises an interesting question. Is it really correct to look at the first hop address when doing the route lookup? The problem is that if we use the first-hop address as th
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00907.html (10,766 bytes)

13. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 19:09:14 -0700
When the ICMP6 packet comes back in such a case, the type zero routing header will be suitable edited. So at least we can determine which exact destination address the PMTU information applies to. Bu
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00941.html (11,085 bytes)

14. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 01:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Well, I think it would probably be another rt6_info{} member rt6i_srcrt (or something like that). --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00945.html (10,731 bytes)

15. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 02:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
Is the overhead for allocating memory okay? Or, do we allcoate some per-cpu memory while ipv6.o initalization phase? (check: lock? preemption?) Or, will we allocate fl (and fl_rt) per sock{} (ipv6_pi
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00946.html (10,810 bytes)

16. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: Kazunori Miyazawa <kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:21:10 +0900
I consider copying flowi(fl_rt) uses too much stack at the moment. I'll re-send the fixed patch again. I agree, and let's defer this patch until we resolve that. Is the overhead for allocating memor
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00947.html (11,860 bytes)

17. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:55:20 +1000
Yes that's brilliant. We can replace the current rt dst with an rthdr dst + an rt dst. The rt dst will be the same one pointing to the first hop. The rthdr will contain MTU information for that exact
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg00948.html (11,132 bytes)

18. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:35:20 -0700
I think memory allocation will make it worse. Instead, I would try to arrange order of events such that single stack copy can be modified. Something like: fl.foo = a; fl.bar = b; x = flow_lookup(&fl)
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01096.html (11,196 bytes)

19. Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:38:30 +0900 (JST)
Thanks for clarification. Miyazawa-san will take care of this when he has returned from another conference. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2004-08/msg01106.html (10,461 bytes)

20. [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup (score: 1)
Author: Kazunori Miyazawa <kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:12:05 +0900
Hello, This patch separates xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup to support srcrt correctly. ip6_dst_lookup should be called with next hop. however xfrm_lookup should be called with final destination. It
/archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01579.html (21,748 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu