Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\[BLUETOOTH\]\s+kill\s+bt_sock

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\[BLUETOOTH\]\s+kill\s+bt_sock_alloc\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 06:49:37 -0300; Please take a look and if acceptable pull from: bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/connection_sock-2.6 Best Regards, - Arnaldo; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00466.html (7,679 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 06:52:09 -0300; Em Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:49:37AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Sorry, now with the patch attached. - Arnaldo Attachment: bt_sock_alloc.patch Description: Text document; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00467.html (8,606 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:35:37 -0800; Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: Em Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:49:37AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, Please take a look and if acceptable pull from: bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/connection; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00541.html (8,996 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: r@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:43:54 -0300; Please note that there are further space savings to tap into in the bt_sock class hierarchy, as not all of the bt_sock descendants needs things like bt_sock::accept_q, etc And when the "kill sk_proti; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00542.html (9,940 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: ky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:24:13 +0100; Hi Max, I didn't got the time to review and test it. Will do that next week. Regards Marcel; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00544.html (8,486 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: o de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:43:15 -0300; Em Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:24:13PM +0100, Marcel Holtmann escreveu: OK, take your time, but the changes are rather small, I left renaming all the _pinfo (l2cap_pinfo, for instance) to _sock (for cons; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00545.html (9,273 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: uck Lever <cel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:51:03 +0100; Hi Arnaldo, the patch is fine so far, but you forgot to change cmtp/sock.c. Please do this and resend it. Send a second patch on top this one which is doing the renaming from *_pinfo to *_sock. I am; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg00669.html (9,660 bytes)
8. [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 06:49:37 -0300; Hi, Please take a look and if acceptable pull from: bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/connection_sock-2.6 Best Regards, - Arnaldo; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02389.html (7,679 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 06:52:09 -0300; Em Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 06:49:37AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Sorry, now with the patch attached. - Arnaldo Attachment: bt_sock_alloc.patch Description: Text document; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02390.html (8,664 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:35:37 -0800; Hi, Please take a look and if acceptable pull from: bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/connection_sock-2.6 Sorry, now with the patch attached. Looks good to me. Marcel I'd suggest for you to apply this pat; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02464.html (9,004 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:43:54 -0300; Please note that there are further space savings to tap into in the bt_sock class hierarchy, as not all of the bt_sock descendants needs things like bt_sock::accept_q, etc And when the "kill sk_proti; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02465.html (10,046 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 19:24:13 +0100; Hi Max, I didn't got the time to review and test it. Will do that next week. Regards Marcel; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02467.html (8,592 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:43:15 -0300; Em Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:24:13PM +0100, Marcel Holtmann escreveu: OK, take your time, but the changes are rather small, I left renaming all the _pinfo (l2cap_pinfo, for instance) to _sock (for cons; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02468.html (9,475 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH][BLUETOOTH] kill bt_sock_alloc (score: 1): Author: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:51:03 +0100; Hi Arnaldo, the patch is fine so far, but you forgot to change cmtp/sock.c. Please do this and resend it. Send a second patch on top this one which is doing the renaming from *_pinfo to *_sock. I am; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg02592.html (9,862 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]