Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\[2\.5\.22\]\s+OOPS\s+in\s+tcp_v6_get

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\[2\.5\.22\]\s+OOPS\s+in\s+tcp_v6_get_port\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: Carl Ritson <critson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 21:26:23 +0100 (BST); Sorry for the repeat email but this bug is also in 2.5.22 and my patch is still valid, although I'm not entirely sure it is the correct fix for the problem? -- From Previous email -- 2.5.21 and 2.5.2; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00093.html (12,574 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:33:19 -0700 (PDT); This is a known bug introduced by the struct sock splitup into external per-protocol pieces done by Arnaldo de Melo. He is working on the proper fix, your proposed change will just paper over the rea; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00094.html (8,869 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 21:57:35 -0300; Em Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 02:33:19PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: Carl, Can you try this patch? - Arnaldo -- orig/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c Sat May 25 23:13:56 2002 +++ linux/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c Fri Jun; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00095.html (11,862 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 19:17:26 -0700 (PDT); -- orig/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c Sat May 25 23:13:56 2002 +++ linux/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c Fri Jun 14 23:23:07 2002 I've installed this change into my tree in the meantime. If we find a better fix, we can ju; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00096.html (9,577 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:49:34 -0300; Em Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:17:26PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: OK, I found a better fix, I think, that allowed me to kill inet6_sk_generic in af_inet6.c, using a constructor for the tcpv6, udpv6; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00097.html (10,957 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: Carl Ritson <critson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:38:48 +0100 (BST); I suspected something like that. This patch doesn't help, it produces exactly the same oops when decoded, I assume the newer patch you mention to Dave is the correct fix? Thanks, Carl; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00101.html (10,372 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:43:21 +0400 (MSD); I am afraid you speak about different bug. Old code really relied on the fact that each IPv4 code has zeroed IPv6 part, and that each IPv6 socket has correctly intialized IPv4 part. So, Carl's sugge; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00102.html (9,657 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 02:58:11 -0700 (PDT); It is different bug, indeed. The oops looked very similar, it tricked me :-); /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00103.html (9,551 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 06:54:15 -0300; Em Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 02:58:11AM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: I'll be looking at this while in Ottawa 8) - Arnaldo; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00112.html (10,069 bytes)
10. [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: Carl Ritson <critson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 21:26:23 +0100 (BST); Sorry for the repeat email but this bug is also in 2.5.22 and my patch is still valid, although I'm not entirely sure it is the correct fix for the problem? -- From Previous email -- 2.5.21 and 2.5.2; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00244.html (12,574 bytes)
11. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:33:19 -0700 (PDT); This is a known bug introduced by the struct sock splitup into external per-protocol pieces done by Arnaldo de Melo. He is working on the proper fix, your proposed change will just paper over the rea; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00245.html (8,963 bytes)
12. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 21:57:35 -0300; Em Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 02:33:19PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: Carl, Can you try this patch? - Arnaldo -- orig/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c Sat May 25 23:13:56 2002 +++ linux/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c Fri Jun; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00246.html (12,000 bytes)
13. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 19:17:26 -0700 (PDT); -- orig/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c Sat May 25 23:13:56 2002 +++ linux/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c Fri Jun 14 23:23:07 2002 I've installed this change into my tree in the meantime. If we find a better fix, we can ju; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00247.html (9,720 bytes)
14. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:49:34 -0300; Em Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:17:26PM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: OK, I found a better fix, I think, that allowed me to kill inet6_sk_generic in af_inet6.c, using a constructor for the tcpv6, udpv6; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00248.html (11,147 bytes)
15. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: Carl Ritson <critson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 08:38:48 +0100 (BST); I suspected something like that. This patch doesn't help, it produces exactly the same oops when decoded, I assume the newer patch you mention to Dave is the correct fix? Thanks, Carl; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00252.html (10,401 bytes)
16. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:43:21 +0400 (MSD); Hello! I am afraid you speak about different bug. Old code really relied on the fact that each IPv4 code has zeroed IPv6 part, and that each IPv6 socket has correctly intialized IPv4 part. So, Carl's; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00253.html (9,695 bytes)
17. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 02:58:11 -0700 (PDT); It is different bug, indeed. The oops looked very similar, it tricked me :-); /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00254.html (9,647 bytes)
18. Re: [PATCH][2.5.22] OOPS in tcp_v6_get_port (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 06:54:15 -0300; Em Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 02:58:11AM -0700, David S. Miller escreveu: I'll be looking at this while in Ottawa 8) - Arnaldo; /archives/netdev/2002-06/msg00263.html (10,212 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]