Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\,pktgen\]\s+account\s+for\s+preamble\s+and\s+inter\-packet\s+gap\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\,pktgen\]\s+account\s+for\s+preamble\s+and\s+inter\-packet\s+gap\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. ssion limit (score: 1): Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:59:23 +0100; lso there without your patch.) From 350B packets or so,; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00013.html (8,121 bytes)
2. t rmmod for needy cards (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:32:51 +0100; ten; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00969.html (8,552 bytes)
3. le and inter-packet gap (score: 1): Author: " <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:21:31 -0800; ktg; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00970.html (9,041 bytes)
4. le and inter-packet gap (score: 1): Author: ytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:37:42 +0100; NIC; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00971.html (8,777 bytes)
5. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:16:13 +0100; n again after a possibly long time. There are protocols like TCP that; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00985.html (8,921 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH,pktgen] account for preamble and inter-packet gap (score: 1): Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:59:23 +0100; Just found out the other day that via-rhine appears to do this. Let's remove it then? At that point it might be easier to just do it in userspace, no? --L; /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00964.html (8,300 bytes)
7. [PATCH,pktgen] account for preamble and inter-packet gap (score: 1): Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:32:51 +0100; Hi! If you account for the Frame Check Sequence when computing bandwidth stats, it's only fair that you count the preamble and inter-packet gap as well. Suggested patch attached. cheers, Lennert -- p; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg02023.html (8,552 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH,pktgen] account for preamble and inter-packet gap (score: 1): Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:21:31 -0800; If you account for the Frame Check Sequence when computing bandwidth stats, it's only fair that you count the preamble and inter-packet gap as well. Suggested patch attached. a) When an ethernet NIC; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg02024.html (8,954 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH,pktgen] account for preamble and inter-packet gap (score: 1): Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:37:42 +0100; Yes. That's how we arrive at the 148kpps 'max pps for fast ethernet' figure -- 100000000 bits per second, each packet taking 8*(8+60+4+12) bits on the wire. Another person suggested in private that w; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg02025.html (8,854 bytes)
10. [PATCH,pktgen] account for preamble and inter-packet gap (score: 1): Author: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:16:13 +0100; Well from pktgen TX view we don't know what the layer under us will do. We simply deliver packets and hope those get transmitted but we are not 100% sure neither about ipg or preample. We don't even; /archives/netdev/2004-11/msg02039.html (8,979 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]