Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\,pktgen\]\s+account\s+for\s+preamble\s+and\s+inter\-packet\s+gap\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. ssion limit (score: 1)
Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:59:23 +0100
lso there without your patch.) From 350B packets or so,
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00013.html (8,121 bytes)

2. t rmmod for needy cards (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:32:51 +0100
ten
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00969.html (8,552 bytes)

3. le and inter-packet gap (score: 1)
Author: " <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:21:31 -0800
ktg
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00970.html (9,041 bytes)

4. le and inter-packet gap (score: 1)
Author: ytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:37:42 +0100
NIC
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00971.html (8,777 bytes)

5. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:16:13 +0100
n again after a possibly long time. There are protocols like TCP that
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00985.html (8,921 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH,pktgen] account for preamble and inter-packet gap (score: 1)
Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:59:23 +0100
Just found out the other day that via-rhine appears to do this. Let's remove it then? At that point it might be easier to just do it in userspace, no? --L
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00964.html (8,300 bytes)

7. [PATCH,pktgen] account for preamble and inter-packet gap (score: 1)
Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 22:32:51 +0100
Hi! If you account for the Frame Check Sequence when computing bandwidth stats, it's only fair that you count the preamble and inter-packet gap as well. Suggested patch attached. cheers, Lennert -- p
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg02023.html (8,552 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH,pktgen] account for preamble and inter-packet gap (score: 1)
Author: Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:21:31 -0800
If you account for the Frame Check Sequence when computing bandwidth stats, it's only fair that you count the preamble and inter-packet gap as well. Suggested patch attached. a) When an ethernet NIC
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg02024.html (8,954 bytes)

9. Re: [PATCH,pktgen] account for preamble and inter-packet gap (score: 1)
Author: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 07:37:42 +0100
Yes. That's how we arrive at the 148kpps 'max pps for fast ethernet' figure -- 100000000 bits per second, each packet taking 8*(8+60+4+12) bits on the wire. Another person suggested in private that w
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg02025.html (8,854 bytes)

10. [PATCH,pktgen] account for preamble and inter-packet gap (score: 1)
Author: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:16:13 +0100
Well from pktgen TX view we don't know what the layer under us will do. We simply deliver packets and hope those get transmitted but we are not 100% sure neither about ipg or preample. We don't even
/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg02039.html (8,979 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu