Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\,\s+RFC\]\s+xfstests\:\s+random\s+fallocate\s+calls\s+in\s+fsx\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:56:30 -0500
Seems to work for me. Any comments/suggestions? I can probably make it fall back to the xfs ioctl if fallocate isn't supported, if strongly desired. diff --git a/aclocal.m4 b/aclocal.m4 index 52f1c7d
/archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00099.html (17,182 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:46:23 -0500
<ping style="hch">ping?</ping> -Eric
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00044.html (21,836 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1)
Author: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:19:39 -0400
Good idea. Is the ioctl going away anytime soon? If not, it might be worth having fsx use _both_ if possible, or just the ioctl if fallocate doesn't seem to be available. I prefer seeing explicit ( )
/archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00047.html (8,504 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:46:23 -0500
ping^3? Does this look ok to folks? It'd be nice to get preallocation coverage in fsx beyond the simple "preallocate first" that's there now. Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00270.html (21,553 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:58:05 -0500
Anybody feel like reviewing this? Seems like having fallocate in the mix would be good. (apologies if it's bitrotted since initial email but it should be generally ok) -Eric
/archives/xfs/2010-03/msg00272.html (21,337 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:41:56 +1100
Looks like all of the autoconf magic went in with the fiemap-tester changes, so a rebase is definitely needed... :/ Otherwise the changes seem sane - I can't find anything obviously wrong reading ove
/archives/xfs/2010-03/msg00273.html (8,035 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu