Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\,\s+RFC\]\s+xfstests\:\s+random\s+fallocate\s+calls\s+in\s+fsx\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\,\s+RFC\]\s+xfstests\:\s+random\s+fallocate\s+calls\s+in\s+fsx\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:56:30 -0500; Seems to work for me. Any comments/suggestions? I can probably make it fall back to the xfs ioctl if fallocate isn't supported, if strongly desired. diff --git a/aclocal.m4 b/aclocal.m4 index 52f1c7d; /archives/xfs/2009-05/msg00099.html (17,182 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:46:23 -0500; <ping style="hch">ping?</ping> -Eric; /archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00044.html (21,836 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1): Author: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jeffpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:19:39 -0400; Good idea. Is the ioctl going away anytime soon? If not, it might be worth having fsx use _both_ if possible, or just the ioctl if fallocate doesn't seem to be available. I prefer seeing explicit ( ); /archives/xfs/2009-06/msg00047.html (8,504 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 21:46:23 -0500; ping^3? Does this look ok to folks? It'd be nice to get preallocation coverage in fsx beyond the simple "preallocate first" that's there now. Thanks, -Eric; /archives/xfs/2009-07/msg00270.html (21,553 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:58:05 -0500; Anybody feel like reviewing this? Seems like having fallocate in the mix would be good. (apologies if it's bitrotted since initial email but it should be generally ok) -Eric; /archives/xfs/2010-03/msg00272.html (21,337 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH, RFC] xfstests: random fallocate calls in fsx (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:41:56 +1100; Looks like all of the autoconf magic went in with the fiemap-tester changes, so a rebase is definitely needed... :/ Otherwise the changes seem sane - I can't find anything obviously wrong reading ove; /archives/xfs/2010-03/msg00273.html (8,035 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]