Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[OT\]\s+XFS\s+and\s+FreeBSD\?\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:59:00 -0400
SGI are not dropping MIPS/Irix. SGI is adding IA64/Linux to their product mix so that customers will have a choice of either MIPS or IA64 solutions.
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03075.html (8,653 bytes)

42. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:06:39 -0400
Irix will remain as MIPS only. My understanding is that it was decided it would take too much work to port Irix to a non-MIPS processor. Instead SGI decided to help in improving Linux in areas SGI fe
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03076.html (8,879 bytes)

43. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:52:50 -0500
Yes but it's all part time effort right now. More volunteers welcome. Actually the NT port using the FreeBSD 2.5 vfs/vnode interface is mounting and making directories. This part will probably be qui
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03081.html (9,515 bytes)

44. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:26:54 -0500
read: huge = any SGI has no business interests in XFS on anything but IRIX and Linux and the also have a business inters test in XFS not ending up on things like Solaris, AIX... etc etc. It's questio
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03082.html (10,356 bytes)

45. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:50:52 +0200
It would be great if someone would do a FreeBSD port of XFS. Linux has benefitted a lot in the past from competive benchmarking and tuning with FreeBSD (and I guess FreeBSD has too). With a good file
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03085.html (9,338 bytes)

46. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Duffy <tduffy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12 Jul 2001 16:19:34 -0700
way back when, IRIX was ported to ia32 (a skunxworks project called IRIX LE for little endian). but, then a bunch of Linux folks at SGI convinced the management that it made more sense to embrace Lin
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03098.html (9,633 bytes)

47. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Tony Gale <gale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Jul 2001 14:08:07 +0100
I can't see SGI maintaining a MIPS platform for very long after they are up and running with IA64. They don't make enough profit to support two such platforms :-) -tony
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03124.html (9,466 bytes)

48. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Gigante <mg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 15:17:29 +1000
Well, maybe, but there are a bunch of things about Irix that are important to our customers, and that Linux is a long way from doing as well. Some of those things may not be aligned with the interest
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03165.html (9,265 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu