Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[OT\]\s+XFS\s+and\s+FreeBSD\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[OT\]\s+XFS\s+and\s+FreeBSD\?\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1): Author: Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:59:00 -0400; SGI are not dropping MIPS/Irix. SGI is adding IA64/Linux to their product mix so that customers will have a choice of either MIPS or IA64 solutions.; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03075.html (8,653 bytes)
42. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1): Author: Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:06:39 -0400; Irix will remain as MIPS only. My understanding is that it was decided it would take too much work to port Irix to a non-MIPS processor. Instead SGI decided to help in improving Linux in areas SGI fe; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03076.html (8,879 bytes)
43. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1): Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:52:50 -0500; Yes but it's all part time effort right now. More volunteers welcome. Actually the NT port using the FreeBSD 2.5 vfs/vnode interface is mounting and making directories. This part will probably be qui; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03081.html (9,515 bytes)
44. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1): Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:26:54 -0500; read: huge = any SGI has no business interests in XFS on anything but IRIX and Linux and the also have a business inters test in XFS not ending up on things like Solaris, AIX... etc etc. It's questio; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03082.html (10,356 bytes)
45. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:50:52 +0200; It would be great if someone would do a FreeBSD port of XFS. Linux has benefitted a lot in the past from competive benchmarking and tuning with FreeBSD (and I guess FreeBSD has too). With a good file; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03085.html (9,338 bytes)
46. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1): Author: Thomas Duffy <tduffy@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: 12 Jul 2001 16:19:34 -0700; way back when, IRIX was ported to ia32 (a skunxworks project called IRIX LE for little endian). but, then a bunch of Linux folks at SGI convinced the management that it made more sense to embrace Lin; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03098.html (9,633 bytes)
47. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1): Author: Tony Gale <gale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 13 Jul 2001 14:08:07 +0100; I can't see SGI maintaining a MIPS platform for very long after they are up and running with IA64. They don't make enough profit to support two such platforms :-) -tony; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03124.html (9,466 bytes)
48. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1): Author: Mike Gigante <mg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 15:17:29 +1000; Well, maybe, but there are a bunch of things about Irix that are important to our customers, and that Linux is a long way from doing as well. Some of those things may not be aligned with the interest; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg03165.html (9,265 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 48
Page: [1] [2] [3]