Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[OT\]\s+XFS\s+and\s+FreeBSD\?\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:21:15 +0800 (PHT)
Hi everyone, I hope this does not cause any major trouble. I am wondering if there is any effort to get XFS working on FreeBSD complete with EAs and ACLs. I do not know what the state of the filesyst
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00469.html (8,105 bytes)

2. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Adam Cioccarelli <alciocca@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:29:17 +0200 (CEST)
I think you'll find that in the mailing list archives... Actually I was wondering, while we are off topic, why SGI didn't try and port Irix to intel architecture? Or will it get ported to IA64? Adam
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00470.html (9,092 bytes)

3. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Adam Cioccarelli <alciocca@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:27:49 +0200 (CEST)
I think you'll find that in the mailing list archives... Actually I was wondering, while we are off topic, why SGI didn't try and port Irix to intel architecture? Or will it get ported to IA64? Adam
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00471.html (9,126 bytes)

4. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Tony Gale <gale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12 Jul 2001 10:36:57 +0100
My guess is that SGI are moving towards IA64 as their base platform and will need a unix OS for it. Linux support for IA64 is somewhat ahead of the BSD one. Linux also works on existing SGI hardware.
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00472.html (9,768 bytes)

5. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:38:52 +0200
At 17:21 12-7-2001 +0800, Federico Sevilla III wrote: Hi everyone, I hope this does not cause any major trouble. I am wondering if there is any effort to get XFS working on FreeBSD complete with EAs
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00474.html (9,934 bytes)

6. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Tony Gale <gale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12 Jul 2001 10:47:15 +0100
I reckon Irix will be dropped when SGI move to the IA64 platform. They'd be fools not to. -tony
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00475.html (9,764 bytes)

7. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:52:13 +0200
I think you'll find that in the mailing list archives... Actually I was wondering, while we are off topic, why SGI didn't try and port Irix to intel architecture? Or will it get ported to IA64? Irix
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00476.html (8,353 bytes)

8. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:14:57 -0500
XFS was ported to Linux because SGI has Linux platforms, we do not have BSD based platforms. Given the amount of effort to get the XFS code GPLed, we have no plans for any other licensing (unless so
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00488.html (9,995 bytes)

9. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:59:00 -0400
SGI are not dropping MIPS/Irix. SGI is adding IA64/Linux to their product mix so that customers will have a choice of either MIPS or IA64 solutions.
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00493.html (8,543 bytes)

10. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:06:39 -0400
Irix will remain as MIPS only. My understanding is that it was decided it would take too much work to port Irix to a non-MIPS processor. Instead SGI decided to help in improving Linux in areas SGI fe
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00494.html (8,783 bytes)

11. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:52:50 -0500
Yes but it's all part time effort right now. More volunteers welcome. Actually the NT port using the FreeBSD 2.5 vfs/vnode interface is mounting and making directories. This part will probably be qui
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00499.html (9,469 bytes)

12. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:26:54 -0500
read: huge = any SGI has no business interests in XFS on anything but IRIX and Linux and the also have a business inters test in XFS not ending up on things like Solaris, AIX... etc etc. It's questio
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00500.html (10,315 bytes)

13. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:50:52 +0200
It would be great if someone would do a FreeBSD port of XFS. Linux has benefitted a lot in the past from competive benchmarking and tuning with FreeBSD (and I guess FreeBSD has too). With a good file
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00503.html (9,205 bytes)

14. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Thomas Duffy <tduffy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12 Jul 2001 16:19:34 -0700
way back when, IRIX was ported to ia32 (a skunxworks project called IRIX LE for little endian). but, then a bunch of Linux folks at SGI convinced the management that it made more sense to embrace Lin
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00516.html (9,537 bytes)

15. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Tony Gale <gale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 13 Jul 2001 14:08:07 +0100
I can't see SGI maintaining a MIPS platform for very long after they are up and running with IA64. They don't make enough profit to support two such platforms :-) -tony
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00542.html (9,303 bytes)

16. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: Mike Gigante <mg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 15:17:29 +1000
Well, maybe, but there are a bunch of things about Irix that are important to our customers, and that Linux is a long way from doing as well. Some of those things may not be aligned with the interest
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00583.html (9,234 bytes)

17. [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:21:15 +0800 (PHT)
Hi everyone, I hope this does not cause any major trouble. I am wondering if there is any effort to get XFS working on FreeBSD complete with EAs and ACLs. I do not know what the state of the filesyst
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01760.html (8,105 bytes)

18. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:29:17 +0200 (CEST)
I think you'll find that in the mailing list archives... Actually I was wondering, while we are off topic, why SGI didn't try and port Irix to intel architecture? Or will it get ported to IA64? Adam
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01761.html (9,092 bytes)

19. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:27:49 +0200 (CEST)
I think you'll find that in the mailing list archives... Actually I was wondering, while we are off topic, why SGI didn't try and port Irix to intel architecture? Or will it get ported to IA64? Adam
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01762.html (9,126 bytes)

20. Re: [OT] XFS and FreeBSD? (score: 1)
Author: xx>
Date: 12 Jul 2001 10:36:57 +0100
My guess is that SGI are moving towards IA64 as their base platform and will need a unix OS for it. Linux support for IA64 is somewhat ahead of the BSD one. Linux also works on existing SGI hardware.
/archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01763.html (9,768 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu