Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[OT\]\s+Re\:\s+xfsdump\s+sample\s+scripts\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[OT\]\s+Re\:\s+xfsdump\s+sample\s+scripts\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. e: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1): Author: Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:06:47 +0200 (CEST); from 0, then from 1, then from 2? Simply restoring from 2 wouldn't work? --> Jijo -- Federico Sevilla III : <http://jijo.free.net.ph/> Network Administrator : The Leather Collection, Inc; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00310.html (8,727 bytes)
2. r on the 2.4.18 XFS tree? (score: 1): Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:20:53 -0400; fo isn't correct all the time. Many times it has shown what basically appears to be a memory leak, when in reality the memory was allocated and /proc/meminfo just doesn't show it. I think; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00318.html (8,921 bytes)
3. e: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:33:10 -0400 (EDT); went and briefly looked at the Amanda website a couple of months ago. It sounded as if it was targeting a collection of Linux servers being backed up to a single tape drive. I'm just back; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00319.html (9,022 bytes)
4. s (score: 1): Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:34:50 -0400; ing to try and determine what might be happening and to help you restore the data. The backup may not be lost and you may be able to recover the files you want. The problem you are having; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00321.html (9,535 bytes)
5. e). (score: 1): Author: Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 09:24:23 +0200 (CEST); little thread recently on Linux Today about official inclusion of XFS in the 2.5 kernel. One interchange went like this: Not anytime soon. The parts of XFS that overlap with generic kerne; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00347.html (8,487 bytes)
6. xxxxx> (score: 1): Author: Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:06:47 +0200 (CEST); ev/hda2. But it didn't print out any bad blocks, just kept giving me this { DriveSeek ... } error. I guess bad blocks works at a much lower level (ie, it's filesystem independ; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00948.html (8,727 bytes)
7. cripts (score: 1): Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:20:53 -0400; full. Thanks. One problem is that you are calling e2fsck if I read your script correctly. I don't think that works with xfs. xfs_check would be a better choice I think. I don't; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00956.html (8,921 bytes)
8. .4.18 XFS tree? (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:33:10 -0400 (EDT); rrect all the time. Many times it has shown what basically appears to be a memory leak, when in reality the memory was allocated and /proc/meminfo just doesn't show it. I think; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00957.html (9,022 bytes)
9. Re: xfsdump sample scripts (score: 1): Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 12:34:50 -0400; for one or more *nix boxes (and Win boxes via samba) backing up to a single tape drive. Many people do use it for a single server, however. Version 2.4.3 of amanda (currently i; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00959.html (9,535 bytes)
10. (kernel compilation failure). (score: 1): Author: Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 09:24:23 +0200 (CEST); , 2002. I don't recall getting a definitive answer on whether we want to support XFS built in with DMAPI as a module or not. Dean? From: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx> To: matthew; /archives/xfs/2002-05/msg00985.html (8,487 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]