Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[NET\]\s+make\s+all\s+protos\s+partially\s+use\s+sk

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[NET\]\s+make\s+all\s+protos\s+partially\s+use\s+sk_prot\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. PATCH: IPSEC acquire in presence of multiple managers (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:39:37 -0300; Hi Dave, Please take a look and apply if acceptable, full description is on the changeset. Ah, I started using __ as a separator between class name and method, I've been using this in some client pro; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01467.html (8,398 bytes)
2. Conntrack leak with raw sockets (score: 1): Author: tthew@xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:09:01 +0100; Hi Arnaldo, I personally don't like the __ separator thing. Is this really needed? What is wrong with using "proto_register()"? Where is the advantage? And please don't convert from using "err" to "r; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01479.html (8,973 bytes)
3. 0-rc2 (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:13:31 -0300; Well, I stated it above, but if there are strong feelings like yours, I'll humbly retract that Consistency, but again, strong feelings, so I'll rework the patch removing the __ and removing the style; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01480.html (10,412 bytes)
4. _prot (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:15:34 -0300; Ah, apart from these style changes, do you think the real changes in this patch are worth? - Arnaldo; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01481.html (10,969 bytes)
5. _prot (score: 1): Author: grawal <devesh.agrawal@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:36:03 +0100; Hi Arnaldo, actually I am the wrong person to judge on this. However if socket users don't have to care about owner and slab anymore (or at least less), I think it is a good thing to do. Btw all the; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01482.html (8,992 bytes)
6. _prot (score: 1): Author: Oester <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:42:20 -0300; OK. I used to be a top nitpicker for this kind of stuff, and avoid it a lot, but used this time only to clearly state that this protocol doesn't use a slab cache, anyway, I'll remove those as well, a; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01483.html (10,365 bytes)
7. [NET] make all protos partially use sk_prot (score: 1): Author: acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo); Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:39:37 -0300; Hi Dave, Please take a look and apply if acceptable, full description is on the changeset. Ah, I started using __ as a separator between class name and method, I've been using this in some client pro; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03390.html (8,398 bytes)
8. Re: [NET] make all protos partially use sk_prot (score: 1): Author: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:09:01 +0100; Hi Arnaldo, I personally don't like the __ separator thing. Is this really needed? What is wrong with using "proto_register()"? Where is the advantage? And please don't convert from using "err" to "r; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03402.html (9,033 bytes)
9. Re: [NET] make all protos partially use sk_prot (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:13:31 -0300; Well, I stated it above, but if there are strong feelings like yours, I'll humbly retract that Consistency, but again, strong feelings, so I'll rework the patch removing the __ and removing the style; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03403.html (10,564 bytes)
10. Re: [NET] make all protos partially use sk_prot (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:15:34 -0300; Ah, apart from these style changes, do you think the real changes in this patch are worth? - Arnaldo; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03404.html (11,128 bytes)
11. Re: [NET] make all protos partially use sk_prot (score: 1): Author: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 14:36:03 +0100; Hi Arnaldo, actually I am the wrong person to judge on this. However if socket users don't have to care about owner and slab anymore (or at least less), I think it is a good thing to do. Btw all the; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03405.html (9,185 bytes)
12. Re: [NET] make all protos partially use sk_prot (score: 1): Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 10:42:20 -0300; OK. I used to be a top nitpicker for this kind of stuff, and avoid it a lot, but used this time only to clearly state that this protocol doesn't use a slab cache, anyway, I'll remove those as well, a; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03406.html (10,646 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]