Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Lse\-tech\]\s+Re\:\s+\(RFC\)\:\s+SKB\s+Initialization\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:47:13 -0500
We I have not looked at Robert's recycle skb patch yet. I couldn't find it in the link he sent me so I don't know how it works. However I thought about it a little more and realized that even when y
/archives/netdev/2002-09/msg00001.html (8,808 bytes)

2. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 12:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
a few
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00106.html (9,048 bytes)

3. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 15:12:06 -0500
still
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00108.html (11,174 bytes)

4. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 15:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
t kee
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00109.html (8,596 bytes)

5. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:02:31 -0400 (EDT)
shou
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00111.html (11,646 bytes)

6. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:04:05 -0500
tota
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00116.html (9,014 bytes)

7. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:53:37 -0500
y the
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00119.html (9,394 bytes)

8. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 06:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
ce...
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00121.html (8,977 bytes)

9. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:18:36 -0500
neti
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00129.html (10,103 bytes)

10. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
ng i
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00132.html (8,852 bytes)

11. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:47:13 -0500
We I have not looked at Robert's recycle skb patch yet. I couldn't find it in the link he sent me so I don't know how it works. However I thought about it a little more and realized that even when y
/archives/netdev/2002-09/msg00379.html (8,838 bytes)

12. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 12:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
Mala, Could you please at least cc netdev on networking related issues? It says so in the kernel FAQ. I swore back around 95 to join lk only when Linux gets a IDE maintainer who is not insane. Hasnt
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00262.html (9,048 bytes)

13. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 15:12:06 -0500
Jamal wrote .. Yes I will, it is a mistake from my part, Even if I turned the hot list, the slab allocator has a per cpu array of objects. In this case it keeps by default 60 objects and hot list kee
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00264.html (11,219 bytes)

14. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 15:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
I swore back around 95 to join lk only when Linux gets a IDE maintainer who is not insane. Hasnt happened yet. Alan is now one of the 2.5.x IDE maintainers, would you like me to add you to linux-kern
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00265.html (8,692 bytes)

15. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:02:31 -0400 (EDT)
Well, the hotlist is supposed to be one way to reduce the effect of initialization. Same conclusion as us then standard practise for eons on networking in rtoses at least. Slab on Linux was supposed
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00267.html (11,708 bytes)

16. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:04:05 -0500
Troy Wilson (who works with me) posted SPECweb99 results using my skbinit patch to lkml on Friday: http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0208.2/1470.html I know you don't subscribe to lkml.
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00272.html (9,059 bytes)

17. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:53:37 -0500
That is true if it is a uni processor but in smp the initialization, if happened in two different CPUs, affects performance due to cache effects. The problem of object (skb) allocation, usage and dea
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00275.html (9,424 bytes)

18. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 06:17:42 -0400 (EDT)
The posting you pointed to says 1% - not that it matters. It becomes more insignificant when skb recycling comes in play mostly because the alloc and freeing of skbs doesnt really show up as hotlist
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00277.html (9,039 bytes)

19. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: "Mala Anand" <manand@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 08:18:36 -0500
Jamal wrote .. SPECweb99 profile shows that __kfree_skb is in the top 5 hot routines. We will test the skb recycle patch on SPECweb99 and add skbinit patch to that and see how it helps. What I unders
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00285.html (10,148 bytes)

20. Re: [Lse-tech] Re: (RFC): SKB Initialization (score: 1)
Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
yes it will. Not significant is my current thinking. i.e i wouldnt write my mother to tell her about it. cheers, jamal
/archives/netdev/2002-08/msg00288.html (8,899 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu