Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[IPV4\]\s+Check\s+mtu\s+instead\s+of\s+frag_list\s+in\s+ip_push_pending

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[IPV4\]\s+Check\s+mtu\s+instead\s+of\s+frag_list\s+in\s+ip_push_pending_frames\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. n rose (score: 1): Author: Chan" <mchan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:56:22 +1100; Hi Dave: I still didn't like the fact that ip_append_data was the only user of dst_pmtu :) So I went looking for bugs in the surrounding code. I managed to find something in ip_push_pending_frames. W; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01173.html (9,606 bytes)
2. GI Altix cross partition functionality (2nd revision) (score: 1): Author: avem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:20:02 -0800; Looks good, applied. Thanks Herbert.; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg01344.html (7,953 bytes)
3. [IPV4] Check mtu instead of frag_list in ip_push_pending_frames (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:56:22 +1100; Hi Dave: I still didn't like the fact that ip_append_data was the only user of dst_pmtu :) So I went looking for bugs in the surrounding code. I managed to find something in ip_push_pending_frames. W; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03096.html (9,651 bytes)
4. Re: [IPV4] Check mtu instead of frag_list in ip_push_pending_frames (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:20:02 -0800; Looks good, applied. Thanks Herbert.; /archives/netdev/2005-03/msg03267.html (8,013 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]