- 1. [HELP] Packet scheduler (score: 1)
- Author: Hanak David <dhanak@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 09 Dec 1999 11:45:10 +0100
- I'm writing a WFQ packet scheduling algorithm for the Linux kernel. Based on scheduler sources shipped with the kernel, I managed to get the hang of it and it works fine. Only I get warnings saying:
- /archives/netdev/1999-12/msg00003.html (8,039 bytes)
- 2. Re: [HELP] Packet scheduler (score: 1)
- Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 17:45:32 +0300 (MSK)
- It is not a warning, it is fatal error. Do not use non-atomic operations in atomic context. enqueue/dequeue are already BH protected. They are already serialized, so that enqueue/dequeue need not an
- /archives/netdev/1999-12/msg00004.html (7,800 bytes)
- 3. Re: [HELP] Packet scheduler (score: 1)
- Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 15:29:58 +0100
- Allocate memory only with the GFP_ATOMIC flag. -Andi
- /archives/netdev/1999-12/msg00005.html (7,584 bytes)
- 4. [HELP] Packet scheduler (score: 1)
- Author: Hanak David <dhanak@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 09 Dec 1999 11:45:10 +0100
- Hi! I'm writing a WFQ packet scheduling algorithm for the Linux kernel. Based on scheduler sources shipped with the kernel, I managed to get the hang of it and it works fine. Only I get warnings sayi
- /archives/netdev/1999-12/msg00095.html (8,039 bytes)
- 5. Re: [HELP] Packet scheduler (score: 1)
- Author: kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 17:45:32 +0300 (MSK)
- Hello! It is not a warning, it is fatal error. Do not use non-atomic operations in atomic context. enqueue/dequeue are already BH protected. They are already serialized, so that enqueue/dequeue need
- /archives/netdev/1999-12/msg00096.html (7,823 bytes)
- 6. Re: [HELP] Packet scheduler (score: 1)
- Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 1999 15:29:58 +0100
- Allocate memory only with the GFP_ATOMIC flag. -Andi
- /archives/netdev/1999-12/msg00097.html (7,630 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu