Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+kernel\s+2\.4\.21\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+kernel\s+2\.4\.21\]\s*$/: 30 ]

Total 30 documents matching your query.

1. [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: 19 Jul 2003 18:05:45 +0100; --Forwarded Message--; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00445.html (13,579 bytes)
2. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: rasz <gorgo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:17:23 -0700; This one was fixed in 2.4.21; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00449.html (8,354 bytes)
3. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: " <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 10:44:28 +0200; David S. Miller wrote: On 19 Jul 2003 18:05:45 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229) Th; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00457.html (9,630 bytes)
4. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:03 +0200; David S. Miller wrote: Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229) This one was fixed in 2.4.21 Still this with 2.4.21 kernel: (intel internet; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00505.html (10,970 bytes)
5. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:35:28 -0700; What interesting programs are you running on this system? Are you running and old version of vsftpd?; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00506.html (9,111 bytes)
6. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:44:14 +0200; David S. Miller wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:03 +0200 Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Still this with 2.4.21 kernel: (intel internet card, driver eepro100) Jul 23 07:25:58 fazer; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00507.html (15,571 bytes)
7. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:46:48 -0700; Any chance you can try with the e100 driver instead of eepro100?; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00508.html (9,777 bytes)
8. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:30:09 +0200; David S. Miller wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:44:14 +0200 Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: David S. Miller wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:03 +0200 Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxx; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00511.html (12,783 bytes)
9. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: dric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:40:37 +0200; David S. Miller wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:44:14 +0200 Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: David S. Miller wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:03 +0200 Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxx; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00512.html (11,003 bytes)
10. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: avid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 04:40:27 -0700; Yes, if anything, e100 works with more cards than eepro100 does. e100 is supported well, whereas I can't remember the last time eepro100 had a change made to it :-); /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00513.html (9,558 bytes)
11. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: emminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 16:34:22 -0700; Any problems yet?; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00585.html (9,426 bytes)
12. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 09:39:11 +0200; David S. Miller wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 13:40:37 +0200 Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Ok, now it's e100 driver, I will wait some hours to see if we have again problems, thanks fo; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00603.html (10,464 bytes)
13. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 07:32:40 -0700; No problem. Alan and Jeff, please note, executive summary: 1) 'eepro100' driver in 2.4.x + high end EFNET IRC server == crashes 2) same as #1 using 'e100' driver == works; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00610.html (10,137 bytes)
14. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: rna@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 11:07:37 -0400; My Official Story(tm) is currently * use e100 * unless you really really want to use eepro100 eepro100 in the kernel tree is essentially unmaintained. One of the big reasons I merged e100 is that it; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00612.html (10,806 bytes)
15. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: <pp@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 18:30:49 +0300; Then maybe it makes sense to enable e100 by default and not eepro100 ? Jeff Garzik wrote: My Official Story(tm) is currently * use e100 * unless you really really want to use eepro100 eepro100 in the; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg00613.html (10,473 bytes)
16. [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 19 Jul 2003 18:05:45 +0100; --Forwarded Message--; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg01134.html (13,639 bytes)
17. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:17:23 -0700; This one was fixed in 2.4.21; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg01138.html (8,418 bytes)
18. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 10:44:28 +0200; Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229) This one was fixed in 2.4.21 Thanks for the information... I'll upgrade and test again... -- Cedri; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg01146.html (9,676 bytes)
19. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:23:03 +0200; Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state != TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229) This one was fixed in 2.4.21 Still this with 2.4.21 kernel: (intel internet card, driver eepro100); /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg01194.html (11,341 bytes)
20. Re: [Fwd: kernel 2.4.21] (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 02:35:28 -0700; What interesting programs are you running on this system? Are you running and old version of vsftpd?; /archives/netdev/2003-07/msg01195.html (9,228 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]