Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+XFS\s+lstat\s+_very

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Fwd\:\s+XFS\s+lstat\s+_very_\s+slow\s+on\s+SMP\]\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 12:30:32 -0500; Forwarding from lkml to somewhere where it might be seen. -- Original Message -- Subject: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 18:25:06 +0200 From: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> To:; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00097.html (11,965 bytes)
2. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:06:02 +1000; Have you tried setting the ihashsize mount option? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner R&D Software Engineer SGI Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00122.html (9,368 bytes)
3. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:35:31 +0200 (CEST); Hello. Is there any reason why this and other options from xfs_vfsops.c are undocumented? Is safe to change their values? jan --; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00123.html (8,221 bytes)
4. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 08:50:11 +1000; Mount options and sysctls are documented in the kernel source tree in Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt. Yes, we missed updating this file for the recent ihashsize addition - I've opened a bug to rem; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00143.html (8,961 bytes)
5. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 14:46:43 +0200; No. I use the defaults. I can try it, just tell me a reasonable value to try (I suppose that it expects a numeric argument). Thanks, -Yenya -- Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00148.html (8,705 bytes)
6. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:26:58 +0200 (CEST); According to http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?coll=linux&db=relnotes&fname=/usr/relnotes/sgi-propack-3-for-linux-sp5 65536 is good choice. jan --; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00149.html (8,767 bytes)
7. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 16:42:04 +0200; Actually from my experience with several high load XFS/NFS servers, a prime number works slightly better: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfs&m=110785998700647&w=2 ...My 5 cents. -- Med venlig; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00151.html (9,806 bytes)
8. [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: ch@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 12:30:32 -0500; Forwarding from lkml to somewhere where it might be seen. -- Original Message -- Subject: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 18:25:06 +0200 From: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> To:; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00298.html (11,965 bytes)
9. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:06:02 +1000; Have you tried setting the ihashsize mount option? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner R&D Software Engineer SGI Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00323.html (9,368 bytes)
10. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: gc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:35:31 +0200 (CEST); Hello. Is there any reason why this and other options from xfs_vfsops.c are undocumented? Is safe to change their values? jan --; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00324.html (8,221 bytes)
11. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 08:50:11 +1000; Mount options and sysctls are documented in the kernel source tree in Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt. Yes, we missed updating this file for the recent ihashsize addition - I've opened a bug to rem; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00344.html (8,961 bytes)
12. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 14:46:43 +0200; No. I use the defaults. I can try it, just tell me a reasonable value to try (I suppose that it expects a numeric argument). Thanks, -Yenya -- Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00349.html (8,705 bytes)
13. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:26:58 +0200 (CEST); According to http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?coll=linux&db=relnotes&fname=/usr/relnotes/sgi-propack-3-for-linux-sp5 65536 is good choice. jan --; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00350.html (8,767 bytes)
14. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 16:42:04 +0200; Actually from my experience with several high load XFS/NFS servers, a prime number works slightly better: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfs&m=110785998700647&w=2 ...My 5 cents. -- Med venlig; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00352.html (9,806 bytes)
15. [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 12:30:32 -0500; Forwarding from lkml to somewhere where it might be seen. Steve Hi all, I have a big XFS volume on my fileserver, and I have noticed that making an incremental backup of this volume is _very_ slow. T; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00499.html (11,389 bytes)
16. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 11:06:02 +1000; Have you tried setting the ihashsize mount option? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner R&D Software Engineer SGI Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00524.html (9,456 bytes)
17. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:35:31 +0200 (CEST); Hello. Is there any reason why this and other options from xfs_vfsops.c are undocumented? Is safe to change their values? jan --; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00525.html (8,303 bytes)
18. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 08:50:11 +1000; Mount options and sysctls are documented in the kernel source tree in Documentation/filesystems/xfs.txt. Yes, we missed updating this file for the recent ihashsize addition - I've opened a bug to rem; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00545.html (9,134 bytes)
19. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 14:46:43 +0200; No. I use the defaults. I can try it, just tell me a reasonable value to try (I suppose that it expects a numeric argument). Thanks, -Yenya -- Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00550.html (8,817 bytes)
20. Re: [Fwd: XFS lstat() _very_ slow on SMP] (score: 1): Author: Jan Derfinak <ja@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:26:58 +0200 (CEST); According to http://techpubs.sgi.com/library/tpl/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?coll=linux&db=relnotes&fname=/usr/relnotes/sgi-propack-3-for-linux-sp5 65536 is good choice. jan --; /archives/xfs/2005-05/msg00551.html (8,893 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]