Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[DEBUG\]\:\s+sk_forward_alloc\s+assertion\s+failures\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. (using driver model) (score: 1)
Author: rovegin <ebs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:12:34 -0800
is always ON and speed/duplex is f
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00571.html (8,928 bytes)

2. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1)
Author: y <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:25:04 +1100
ings like nf_debug and nf_cache were
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00572.html (9,287 bytes)

3. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1)
Author: er" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:37:37 +1100
s who can reproduce the problem give this test patch a whirl? Herbert and I aren't exactly sure what the exact sequence of events is that causes the problem, but
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00573.html (10,136 bytes)

4. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1)
Author: <anton@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:50:17 -0800 (PST)
on, lets see if it reproduces. Anton
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00574.html (10,641 bytes)

5. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1)
Author: ert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:10:05 +1100
nt. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00575.html (10,163 bytes)

6. ion failures (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:44:51 -0800
claim function and subsequently goes
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00577.html (9,544 bytes)

7. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1)
Author: hemminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:09:47 -0800
register 41c to set. repeats about 5 times then goes away.
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00578.html (9,887 bytes)

8. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1)
Author: avem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:19:14 -0800
>truesize adjustment, as the test patch does, then we must take out the sk_wmem_queued and sk_forward_alloc adjustments, as the test patch also does. :-)
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00579.html (11,364 bytes)

9. ipip.c ? (score: 1)
Author: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:16:48 +1100
t 2.4.x as well. Thanks. --yoshfuji
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00584.html (10,535 bytes)

10. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1)
Author: k <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:03:22 +1100
ng the device, both when at-the-tim
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00585.html (10,825 bytes)

11. icy router operates faster/better than V2.6 (score: 1)
Author: y <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:03:52 -0800
Restore net/sched/ipt.c After iptab
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00598.html (10,423 bytes)

12. le bug in net/core/pktgen.c (2.6.10 kernel) (score: 1)
Author: . Guthrie" <jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 07:34:52 +1100
to be shortly after the cache flush
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00601.html (11,340 bytes)

13. t Ethernet PHY support (using driver model) (score: 1)
Author: k <kyoungso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:34:25 +1100
t, is there any glaring reason why?
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00604.html (11,135 bytes)

14. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1)
Author: g <afleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:27:57 -0800
ial "fixed settings" one. And all t
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00605.html (11,480 bytes)

15. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1)
Author: erbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:38:29 +1100
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbe
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00606.html (12,094 bytes)

16. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1)
Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:36:11 -0800
ages onto that SKB in the queue. Unl
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00607.html (11,486 bytes)

17. TCH] remove superfluous diverter printk'ing (score: 1)
Author: ller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:55:04 +1100
dd data to the packet. We always account what is actually put into the packet in this way. That's why I made the fix t
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00610.html (12,796 bytes)

18. ilter? (score: 1)
Author: emminger@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:04:26 -0800
hen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00614.html (11,882 bytes)

19. es (score: 1)
Author: ller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:47:45 +1100
tion. - Arnald
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00616.html (12,796 bytes)

20. lec.c (score: 1)
Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:55:43 -0800
can undo all the IRQ based locking.
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00624.html (13,786 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu