Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[DEBUG\]\:\s+sk_forward

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[DEBUG\]\:\s+sk_forward_alloc\s+assertion\s+failures\s*$/: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

1. (using driver model) (score: 1): Author: rovegin <ebs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:12:34 -0800; is always ON and speed/duplex is f; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00571.html (8,928 bytes)
2. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: y <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:25:04 +1100; ings like nf_debug and nf_cache were; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00572.html (9,287 bytes)
3. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: er" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:37:37 +1100; s who can reproduce the problem give this test patch a whirl? Herbert and I aren't exactly sure what the exact sequence of events is that causes the problem, but; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00573.html (10,136 bytes)
4. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: <anton@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:50:17 -0800 (PST); on, lets see if it reproduces. Anton; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00574.html (10,641 bytes)
5. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: ert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:10:05 +1100; nt. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00575.html (10,163 bytes)
6. ion failures (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:44:51 -0800; claim function and subsequently goes; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00577.html (9,544 bytes)
7. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: hemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:09:47 -0800; register 41c to set. repeats about 5 times then goes away.; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00578.html (9,887 bytes)
8. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: avem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:19:14 -0800; >truesize adjustment, as the test patch does, then we must take out the sk_wmem_queued and sk_forward_alloc adjustments, as the test patch also does. :-); /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00579.html (11,364 bytes)
9. ipip.c ? (score: 1): Author: yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:16:48 +1100; t 2.4.x as well. Thanks. --yoshfuji; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00584.html (10,535 bytes)
10. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: k <buytenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:03:22 +1100; ng the device, both when at-the-tim; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00585.html (10,825 bytes)
11. icy router operates faster/better than V2.6 (score: 1): Author: y <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:03:52 -0800; Restore net/sched/ipt.c After iptab; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00598.html (10,423 bytes)
12. le bug in net/core/pktgen.c (2.6.10 kernel) (score: 1): Author: . Guthrie" <jeremy.guthrie@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 07:34:52 +1100; to be shortly after the cache flush; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00601.html (11,340 bytes)
13. t Ethernet PHY support (using driver model) (score: 1): Author: k <kyoungso@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:34:25 +1100; t, is there any glaring reason why?; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00604.html (11,135 bytes)
14. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: g <afleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:27:57 -0800; ial "fixed settings" one. And all t; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00605.html (11,480 bytes)
15. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: erbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:38:29 +1100; Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbe; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00606.html (12,094 bytes)
16. DEBUG]: sk_forward_alloc assertion failures (score: 1): Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:36:11 -0800; ages onto that SKB in the queue. Unl; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00607.html (11,486 bytes)
17. TCH] remove superfluous diverter printk'ing (score: 1): Author: ller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:55:04 +1100; dd data to the packet. We always account what is actually put into the packet in this way. That's why I made the fix t; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00610.html (12,796 bytes)
18. ilter? (score: 1): Author: emminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:04:26 -0800; hen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00614.html (11,882 bytes)
19. es (score: 1): Author: ller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 09:47:45 +1100; tion. - Arnald; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00616.html (12,796 bytes)
20. lec.c (score: 1): Author: vem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:55:43 -0800; can undo all the IRQ based locking.; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00624.html (13,786 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]