Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[CryptoAPI\-devel\]\s+Re\:\s+\[Design\]\s+\[PATCH\]\s+USAGI\s+IPsec\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: 21 Oct 2002 09:34:14 +0200
has been neglec
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00365.html (10,550 bytes)

2. Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec (score: 1)
Author: dre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:27:07 -0700
ng wastes CPU a
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00367.html (12,373 bytes)

3. Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec (score: 1)
Author: x
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:02:00 +0300
·μ—μ„œλŠ” DVD 둜 μŠΉλΆ€ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. λΆˆλŸ‰μŠ€λŸ° λ™μ˜μƒ λ•Œλ¬Έμ— μ–Όλ§ˆλ‚˜ λˆˆλ‚˜λΉ μ§€μ…¨μŠ΅λ‹ˆκΉŒ?. μ΄ˆμ λ§žμ§€ μ•ŠλŠ” 화면을 μ„ λͺ…ν•˜κ²Œ λ§Œλ“ λ‹€κ³  ν™”λ©΄ μ‚¬μ΄μ¦ˆλ₯Ό μ€„μ—¬μ„œ λ³΄μ‹œμ§€ μ•Šμ•˜μ—ˆλ‚˜μš”? ν•˜λ£¨λ₯Ό 살아도 μ‚¬λžŒλ‹΅κ²Œ λΌλŠ” 말이 μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. 이제 ν•œνŽΈμ„ 보더라도 ν™•μ‹€ν•˜κ³  μ„ λͺ…ν•˜κ²Œ λ³΄μ‹­μ‹œμš” CD 둜 κ΅¬μ›Œμ„œ
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00399.html (11,373 bytes)

4. formance? (score: 1)
Author: Denis Vlasenko <vda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:50:26 -0400
 •λ³΄λ³΄ν˜Έ 등에 κ΄€ν•œ 법λ₯  및 μ²­ μ†Œλ…„λ³΄ν˜Έλ²•μ˜ κ·œμ •μ— μ˜ν•˜μ—¬ 19μ„Έλ―Έλ§Œμ˜ μ²­μ†Œλ…„μ΄ 이용 ν•  수 μ—†μŠ΅λ‹ˆλ‹€. κ·€ν•˜μ˜ λ©”μΌμ£Όμ†ŒλŠ” μ›Ήμ„œν•‘ 쀑에 μ•Œκ²Œλœ κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ 기타 λ‹€λ₯Έ κ°œμΈμ •λ³΄λŠ” μ—†μŒμ„ μ•Œλ €λ“œλ¦½λ‹ˆλ‹€
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00506.html (11,675 bytes)

5. problems. (score: 1)
Author: gjin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:55:25 -0300
bind to its addresses? With IPV6_V6ONLY connectio
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00535.html (13,650 bytes)

6. Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Valerio Riedel <hvr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 21 Oct 2002 09:34:14 +0200
oh... nice to learn about your plans (so late) at all ;-) well, it would be cool if you'd cooperate (or at least share information) with us (the official cryptoapi project ;-), as we're open for the
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00976.html (10,657 bytes)

7. Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec (score: 1)
Author: Sandy Harris <sandy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 19:27:07 -0700
A completely new CryptoAPI subsystem has been implemented so that full lists of page vectors can be passed into the ciphers, which is necessary for a clean IPSEC implementation. oh... nice to learn
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg00978.html (12,720 bytes)

8. Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec (score: 1)
Author: Jari Ruusu <jari.ruusu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:02:00 +0300
Official cryptoapi? Define official. kerneli.org/cryptoapi _is_ useless joke for many needs. Fortunately other people are able to see the limitations/sillyness of kerneli.org/cryptoapi: 1) You are tr
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01010.html (11,482 bytes)

9. Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec (score: 1)
Author: Jean-Luc Cooke <jlcooke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:50:26 -0400
Jari has a few points here. But the "killer" functionalities are all there IMHO. Low-level assembler implementations are over-rated, again IMHO. The performance difference between C and ASM is at mos
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01117.html (11,895 bytes)

10. Re: [CryptoAPI-devel] Re: [Design] [PATCH] USAGI IPsec (score: 1)
Author: "JuanJo Ciarlante" <jjo-ipsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:55:25 -0300
According to my tests, AES ASM has given me _2x_ speed boost over C; this fact has re-written freeswan CPU/bandwidth empirical formula to peak at CPU [MHz] ~= BW [Mbit/s] * 10 (instead of 25) This bo
/archives/netdev/2002-10/msg01146.html (13,898 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu