- 1. Re: [CHECKER] 32 Memory Leaks on Error Paths (score: 1)
- Author: er" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:07:48 +0200
- Looks valid. And since skb isn't really needed until after these returns, moving four lines down a bit fixes the problem. Davem, is this correct? Jörn -- Data dominates. If you've chosen the right
- /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg00484.html (10,206 bytes)
- 2. Re: [CHECKER] 32 Memory Leaks on Error Paths (score: 1)
- Author: ller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 00:58:11 -0700
- Nope, now you're leaking the route instead of the SKB :-) I'll put the correct fix in.
- /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg00591.html (7,927 bytes)
- 3. Re: [CHECKER] 32 Memory Leaks on Error Paths (score: 1)
- Author: Jörn Engel <joern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:07:48 +0200
- Looks valid. And since skb isn't really needed until after these returns, moving four lines down a bit fixes the problem. Davem, is this correct? Jörn -- Data dominates. If you've chosen the right da
- /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg01413.html (10,332 bytes)
- 4. Re: [CHECKER] 32 Memory Leaks on Error Paths (score: 1)
- Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 00:58:11 -0700
- Nope, now you're leaking the route instead of the SKB :-) I'll put the correct fix in.
- /archives/netdev/2003-09/msg01520.html (8,050 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu