Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bug\s+299\]\s+compiling\s+xfsprogs\-2\.6\.0\s+fails\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 16:28:12 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From hch@xxxxxxx 2004-01-01 16:28 PDT -- This looks like some autoconf incompatiblity. What version of autoconf are you using? -
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00008.html (8,010 bytes)

2. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 06:26:50 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From karlran@xxxxxxxxxxx 2004-10-01 06:26 PDT -- I've tried: $ autoconf --version Autoconf version 2.13 and $ autoconf --version
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00146.html (8,366 bytes)

3. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:51:09 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From nathans@xxxxxxx 2004-11-01 17:51 PDT -- This looks like the first major problem... Can you send the test program that confi
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00158.html (8,832 bytes)

4. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:15:26 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2004-12-01 16:15 PDT -- BTW, I just tried rebuilding the newly released xfsprogs-2.6.2, and I'm seei
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00173.html (9,457 bytes)

5. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:05:59 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2004-12-01 16:17 PDT -- Created an attachment (id=95) --> (http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/attachment.cg
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00177.html (8,803 bytes)

6. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:01:12 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2004-12-01 18:59 PDT -- Created an attachment (id=96) --> (http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/attachment.cg
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00181.html (9,342 bytes)

7. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:11:33 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From nathans@xxxxxxx 2004-12-01 22:11 PDT -- Sorry, my last mailw as a bit misleading - where I said there will be a failing tes
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00183.html (8,560 bytes)

8. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:55:42 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2004-13-01 05:55 PDT -- OK, well, i attached my config.log last night, so I think you should have it
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00185.html (8,123 bytes)

9. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:22:54 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From nathans@xxxxxxx 2004-13-01 21:22 PDT -- OK, I see the problem, and having a look through the current autoconf documentation
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00195.html (8,802 bytes)

10. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:55:26 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From netllama@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2004-14-01 15:55 PDT -- Your workaround did the trick. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail becaus
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00206.html (8,042 bytes)

11. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:12:38 -0800
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Additional Comments From karlran@xxxxxxxxxxx 2004-17-01 07:12 PDT -- Yep. Here too. Thanks Nathan! -- You are receiving this mail because: -- You ar
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00246.html (8,142 bytes)

12. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 15:29:15 -0800
m4/
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00260.html (8,317 bytes)

13. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 16:28:12 -0800
Yo
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00374.html (8,010 bytes)

14. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 06:26:50 -0800
18e
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00512.html (8,366 bytes)

15. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:51:09 -0800
ty"
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00524.html (8,832 bytes)

16. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:15:26 -0800
in
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00539.html (9,457 bytes)

17. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:05:59 -0800
I'm
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00543.html (8,803 bytes)

18. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:01:12 -0800
fo
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00547.html (9,342 bytes)

19. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:11:33 -0800
org
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00549.html (8,560 bytes)

20. [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails (score: 1)
Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:55:42 -0800
ho
/archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00551.html (8,123 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu