Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bug\s+290\]\s+XFS\s+Kernel\s+Memory\s+Leak\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bug\s+290\]\s+XFS\s+Kernel\s+Memory\s+Leak\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:33:16 -0800; a; /archives/xfs/2005-01/msg00108.html (7,472 bytes)
2. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:52:56 -0800; l; /archives/xfs/2005-01/msg00112.html (7,753 bytes)
3. Re: [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: x; Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:34:26 -0800; 2; /archives/xfs/2005-01/msg00113.html (8,113 bytes)
4. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:33:16 -0800; n a; /archives/xfs/2005-01/msg00258.html (7,472 bytes)
5. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:52:56 -0800; all; /archives/xfs/2005-01/msg00262.html (7,753 bytes)
6. Re: [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: xxx; Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:34:26 -0800; -22; /archives/xfs/2005-01/msg00263.html (8,113 bytes)
7. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: emon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:00:30 -0700; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 hch@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added -- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Additional Comments From hch@xxxxxxx 2004-15-06 10:00 PDT; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00142.html (6,968 bytes)
8. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: ssell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 10:00:30 -0700; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 hch@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added -- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME -- Additional Comments From hch@xxxxxxx 2004-15-06 10:00 PDT; /archives/xfs/2004-06/msg00428.html (6,968 bytes)
9. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:02:57 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From hch@xxxxxxx 2004-01-01 17:02 PDT -- Can you retry with 2.6.1-rc1? It has fixes to better reclaim inodes and dentries. -- Yo; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00007.html (6,721 bytes)
10. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:02:57 -0800; 24-; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00373.html (6,721 bytes)
11. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 19:05:37 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2003-22-11 19:05 PDT -- Any chance you can try this same test on a non-xfs box? Just to narrow down whether; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00187.html (7,188 bytes)
12. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:03:35 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From condor-sgi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2003-22-11 20:03 PDT -- Sadly (:p), all my machines are XFS. I'll ask around and see if I can find; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00188.html (7,489 bytes)
13. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:29:05 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2003-23-11 09:29 PDT -- No problem, I can test this on an ext3 box. Just figured if you had one handy you c; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00190.html (7,177 bytes)
14. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:05:25 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2003-24-11 15:05 PDT -- Actually, what makes you certain that this is a leak, rather than normal caching, e; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00201.html (7,187 bytes)
15. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:16:22 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From condor-sgi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2003-24-11 17:16 PDT -- Well, I think it's a leak largely because it eats non-buffer, non-cached R; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00203.html (8,195 bytes)
16. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 19:05:37 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2003-22-11 19:05 PDT -- Any chance you can try this same test on a non-xfs box? Just to narrow down whether; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00448.html (7,188 bytes)
17. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 20:03:35 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From condor-sgi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2003-22-11 20:03 PDT -- Sadly (:p), all my machines are XFS. I'll ask around and see if I can find; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00449.html (7,489 bytes)
18. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:29:05 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2003-23-11 09:29 PDT -- No problem, I can test this on an ext3 box. Just figured if you had one handy you c; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00451.html (7,177 bytes)
19. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:05:25 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2003-24-11 15:05 PDT -- Actually, what makes you certain that this is a leak, rather than normal caching, e; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00462.html (7,187 bytes)
20. [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:16:22 -0800; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 -- Additional Comments From condor-sgi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2003-24-11 17:16 PDT -- Well, I think it's a leak largely because it eats non-buffer, non-cached R; /archives/xfs/2003-11/msg00464.html (8,195 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]