Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BUG\]\s+2\.6\.0\-test4\-mm1\:\s+NFS\+XFS\=data\s+corruption\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:45:43 -0700
-mm kernels have O_DIRECT-for-NFS patches in them. And some versions of RPM use O_DIRECT. Whether O_DIRECT makes any difference at the server end I do not know, but it would be useful if you could re
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00274.html (10,344 bytes)

2. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Aug 2003 17:54:11 -0500
I doubt the NFS client is O_DIRECT capable here, I have run some rpm builds over nfs to 2.6.0-test4 and an xfs filesystem, everything is behaving so far. I will try mm1 tomorrow. Do we know if this N
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00276.html (11,478 bytes)

3. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 03:14:12 -0700
OK, sorry for the noise. It appears that this is due to the AIO patches in -mm. fsx-linux fails instantly on nfsv3 to localhost on XFS. It's OK on ext2 for some reason. Binary searching reveals that
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00277.html (10,609 bytes)

4. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:31:11 +0530
I'm not sure if this would help here, but there is one bug which I just spotted which would affect writev from XFS. I wasn't passing the nr_segs down properly. Regards Suparna -- Suparna Bhattacharya
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00279.html (11,395 bytes)

5. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:44:58 -0700
That fixes it, thanks.
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00291.html (9,179 bytes)

6. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Aug 2003 12:57:21 -0500
Does rpm use readv/writev though? Or does the nfs server? not sure how this change would affect the original problem report. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00293.html (9,879 bytes)

7. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:34:29 -0700
The NFS server uses multisegment writev. RPM was running at the other end of the ethernet, so it doesn't really matter what sort of write RPM is issuing.
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00294.html (9,349 bytes)

8. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 12:45:43 -0700
-mm kernels have O_DIRECT-for-NFS patches in them. And some versions of RPM use O_DIRECT. Whether O_DIRECT makes any difference at the server end I do not know, but it would be useful if you could re
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00626.html (10,344 bytes)

9. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Aug 2003 17:54:11 -0500
I doubt the NFS client is O_DIRECT capable here, I have run some rpm builds over nfs to 2.6.0-test4 and an xfs filesystem, everything is behaving so far. I will try mm1 tomorrow. Do we know if this N
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00628.html (11,478 bytes)

10. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 03:14:12 -0700
OK, sorry for the noise. It appears that this is due to the AIO patches in -mm. fsx-linux fails instantly on nfsv3 to localhost on XFS. It's OK on ext2 for some reason. Binary searching reveals that
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00629.html (10,609 bytes)

11. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Suparna Bhattacharya <suparna@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 16:31:11 +0530
I'm not sure if this would help here, but there is one bug which I just spotted which would affect writev from XFS. I wasn't passing the nr_segs down properly. Regards Suparna -- Suparna Bhattacharya
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00631.html (11,395 bytes)

12. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:44:58 -0700
That fixes it, thanks.
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00643.html (9,179 bytes)

13. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 26 Aug 2003 12:57:21 -0500
Does rpm use readv/writev though? Or does the nfs server? not sure how this change would affect the original problem report. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00645.html (9,879 bytes)

14. Re: [BUG] 2.6.0-test4-mm1: NFS+XFS=data corruption (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 11:34:29 -0700
The NFS server uses multisegment writev. RPM was running at the other end of the ethernet, so it doesn't really matter what sort of write RPM is issuing.
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00646.html (9,349 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu