Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BK\s+PATCH\]\s+2\.6\.2\s+SCTP\s+updates\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BK\s+PATCH\]\s+2\.6\.2\s+SCTP\s+updates\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: avid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:24:32 -0800 (PST); Hi Dave, Please do a bk pull http://linux-lksctp.bkbits.net/lksctp-2.5.work to get the following udpates to SCTP on top of linux 2.6.2 These csets include fixes for a couple of issues that were repor; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00137.html (9,453 bytes)
2. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:45:18 -0800; Pulled, but. Why do you use specialized SCTP rmem/wmem values and not the globally sysctl's ones we have for sockets already?; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00139.html (8,748 bytes)
3. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:07:48 -0800 (PST); Dave, I guess i was influenced by the TCP specific tcp_rmem/tcp_wmem. But TCP seems to be using them as a vector of 3 values and tuning the buffer sizes dynamically based on these values. As of now,; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00178.html (9,473 bytes)
4. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 10:39:21 -0800; It seems as duplication if there is no specific need to have seperate controls right?; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00179.html (9,072 bytes)
5. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:01:20 -0800 (PST); OK. I removed the SCTP specific rmem/wmem. Please do a pull again from http://linux-lksctp.bkbits.net/lksctp-2.5.work to get the following cset. ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2004-02-09 11:14:24-08:00, sri@xxxxx; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00209.html (9,484 bytes)
6. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:26:47 -0800; Pulled, thanks for following up on this Sridhar. What is the status of synchronizing the 2.4.x SCTP sources?; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00210.html (9,146 bytes)
7. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: ndrovec <vandrove@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:34:06 -0800 (PST); It is going on well. I hope to get it done by the end of this week. Do you want me to wait for 2.4.25 release? Or can i submit it even in the -rc phase? -Sridhar; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00211.html (8,903 bytes)
8. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:34:18 -0800; Sridhar Samudrala wrote: ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2004-02-09 11:14:24-08:00, sri@xxxxxxxxxx [SCTP] Removed SCTP specific rmem/wmem sysctl's and use the global rmem_default/wmem_default values for SCTP socke; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00212.html (9,549 bytes)
9. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: r" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:39:37 -0800; I would like to have it as soon as possible. Not necessarily so that it gets merged into 2.4.25 (I don't think I'll try to do that) but moreso because I'd like to do review it now such that when 2.4.; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00214.html (9,285 bytes)
10. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: la <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:41:45 -0800; I understand. But there was no known reason to tweak things for SCTP. If one wanted to adjust things system wide there was no way for it to apply to SCTP too. Also, the TCP controls are not as they w; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00215.html (9,429 bytes)
11. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:50:18 -0800; David S. Miller wrote: I understand. But there was no known reason to tweak things for SCTP. Yeah, I agree it doesn't matter right now for SCTP. I don't know of anyone running SCTP *and* heavy NFS/ra; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00217.html (9,747 bytes)
12. [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:24:32 -0800 (PST); Hi Dave, Please do a bk pull http://linux-lksctp.bkbits.net/lksctp-2.5.work to get the following udpates to SCTP on top of linux 2.6.2 These csets include fixes for a couple of issues that were repor; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00878.html (9,468 bytes)
13. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:45:18 -0800; Pulled, but. Why do you use specialized SCTP rmem/wmem values and not the globally sysctl's ones we have for sockets already?; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00880.html (8,845 bytes)
14. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:07:48 -0800 (PST); Dave, I guess i was influenced by the TCP specific tcp_rmem/tcp_wmem. But TCP seems to be using them as a vector of 3 values and tuning the buffer sizes dynamically based on these values. As of now,; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00919.html (9,603 bytes)
15. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 10:39:21 -0800; It seems as duplication if there is no specific need to have seperate controls right?; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00920.html (9,232 bytes)
16. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:01:20 -0800 (PST); OK. I removed the SCTP specific rmem/wmem. Please do a pull again from http://linux-lksctp.bkbits.net/lksctp-2.5.work to get the following cset. ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2004-02-09 11:14:24-08:00, sri@xxxxx; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00950.html (9,614 bytes)
17. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:26:47 -0800; Pulled, thanks for following up on this Sridhar. What is the status of synchronizing the 2.4.x SCTP sources?; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00951.html (9,321 bytes)
18. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:34:06 -0800 (PST); It is going on well. I hope to get it done by the end of this week. Do you want me to wait for 2.4.25 release? Or can i submit it even in the -rc phase? -Sridhar; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00952.html (9,096 bytes)
19. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:34:18 -0800; ChangeSet@xxxxxx, 2004-02-09 11:14:24-08:00, sri@xxxxxxxxxx [SCTP] Removed SCTP specific rmem/wmem sysctl's and use the global rmem_default/wmem_default values for SCTP socket buffer sizes. Sorry to; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00953.html (9,590 bytes)
20. Re: [BK PATCH] 2.6.2 SCTP updates (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:39:37 -0800; I would like to have it as soon as possible. Not necessarily so that it gets merged into 2.4.25 (I don't think I'll try to do that) but moreso because I'd like to do review it now such that when 2.4.; /archives/netdev/2004-02/msg00955.html (9,523 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]