Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ANNOUNCE\]\s+Red\s+Hat\s+Linux\s+9\s+XFS\s+DVD\s+Released\s*$/: 74 ]

Total 74 documents matching your query.

1. [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 03:27:28 +0200
The first version of my Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD has been released and should appear on my mirror in a few hours. The address to the mirror is below. // Stefan Version 0.0.1 (2003-04-10) Disclaimer Th
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00097.html (15,434 bytes)

2. RE: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: "Kai Leibrandt" <k_leibrandt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:47:54 +0200
<SNIPPED workaround for grub bug> Or what you can do to fix grub is: 1) install, ignoring the grub bug 2) reboot into rescue mode from the DVD 3) mount your root partition _only_ 4) chroot to that d
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00118.html (9,139 bytes)

3. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:38:21 +0200
There is a bug with using GRUB as a bootloader. Either use LILO or use one of the following workarounds: <SNIPPED workaround for grub bug> Or what you can do to fix grub is: 1) install, ignoring the
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00120.html (9,922 bytes)

4. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Apr 2003 20:41:21 GMT
[...] Oh, I already got used to work around (exactly the way you mention here) what you call a 'bug' - I thought it was a 'feature' ;-) Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00122.html (9,771 bytes)

5. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:07:30 +0200
Martin Spott wrote: "Kai Leibrandt" <k_leibrandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: There is a bug with using GRUB as a bootloader. Either use LILO or use one of the following workarounds: [...] Or what you can do
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00123.html (10,663 bytes)

6. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Mogens Kjaer <mk@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:56:23 +0200
There is a bug with using GRUB as a bootloader. Either use LILO or use one of the following workarounds: * Make a seperate /boot partition and use some other filesystem than xfs on it. That way you w
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00136.html (12,878 bytes)

7. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Ajay Ramaswamy <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Apr 2003 18:55:26 +0530
If I remember right the SGI installer for 7.3 used to add a sleep(30) between each of those isys.sync() calls, may be you need to patch the booty source rpm and put it into the RPMS folder before you
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00137.html (13,634 bytes)

8. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Mogens Kjaer <mk@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:08:46 +0200
If I remember right the SGI installer for 7.3 used to add a sleep(30) between each of those isys.sync() calls, may be you need to patch the booty source rpm and put it into the RPMS folder before you
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00138.html (10,840 bytes)

9. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Mogens Kjaer <mk@xxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 13:38:27 +0200
If I remember right the SGI installer for 7.3 used to add a sleep(30) between each of those isys.sync() calls, may be you need to patch the booty source rpm and put it into the RPMS folder before you
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00166.html (11,214 bytes)

10. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 14:42:52 +0200
Mogens Kjaer wrote: Ajay Ramaswamy wrote: ... If I remember right the SGI installer for 7.3 used to add a sleep(30) between each of those isys.sync() calls, may be you need to patch the booty source
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00168.html (11,597 bytes)

11. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Mogens Kjaer <mk@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:38:41 +0200
Hm, there must be a better way of doing this (tm). Remounting the installation partition? ... Success! It turned out to be easier than I thought: I couldn't umount /mnt/sysimage, it was busy because
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00175.html (11,168 bytes)

12. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:18:29 +0200
Mogens Kjaer wrote: Mogens Kjaer wrote: ... Hm, there must be a better way of doing this (tm). Remounting the installation partition? ... Success! It turned out to be easier than I thought: I couldn'
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00179.html (11,424 bytes)

13. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Richard Houston <rhouston@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 Apr 2003 11:00:35 -0500
Hi Great work. Any word yet on a cd-rom based XFS installer for RH 9.0 yet. Just wondering. Really looking forward to this. Thanks Rich On Tue, 2003-04-15 at 10:18, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: -- Rich
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00180.html (11,959 bytes)

14. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Richard Houston <rhouston@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 Apr 2003 11:14:15 -0500
I heartily agree with you. My question stems from one of the original posts on this thread mentioning that they would be starting on the CD version after the DVD was finished. Or at least something t
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00181.html (13,303 bytes)

15. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: "brett holcomb" <brettholcomb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:27:36 -0400
I'm not sure what is happening. I haven't looked at it since November/December when I downloaded the RH 7.3 installer. I noticed the posting at the time. Since I no longer use RH I haven't followed i
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00183.html (13,212 bytes)

16. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 15 Apr 2003 11:29:58 -0500
lest I be accused of breaking promises, I -did- stop after the RH 7.3 installer. Russell did the 8.0 installer. :) But if anyone wants to pick up the installer manufacturing duties, it would certainl
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00184.html (10,714 bytes)

17. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: "brett holcomb" <brettholcomb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 12:33:22 -0400
Okay, so I wasn't crazy - I did see that note. I don't use RH anymore so I haven't followed the RH XFS install. RH just needs to add XFS as a choice. They say the do servers and from what I've seen X
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00185.html (11,289 bytes)

18. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Richard Houston <rhouston@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 Apr 2003 11:53:09 -0500
My sincerest apologies Eric. I did not know it was not an official XFS installer and I surely did not want to sound like I was making an accusation and it defiantly sounds like I was. Sorry!! Like I
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00187.html (11,089 bytes)

19. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Stefan Smietanowski <stesmi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 02:02:12 +0200
Hi Mogens. Hm, there must be a better way of doing this (tm). Remounting the installation partition? ... Success! It turned out to be easier than I thought: I couldn't umount /mnt/sysimage, it was bu
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00197.html (12,296 bytes)

20. Re: [ANNOUNCE] Red Hat Linux 9 XFS DVD Released (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 Apr 2003 19:18:09 -0500
Yes I discoverd the same thing. I think the real solutions is to do a readonly and then a read write mount. I just don't know if the python code supports a remount. -- Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxx
/archives/xfs/2003-04/msg00198.html (12,731 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu