Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[ANN\]\s+2nd\s+STABLE\s+release\s+of\s+USAGI\s+Project\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: USAGI Project <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 17:15:08 +0900
We are glad that we can announce the 2nd STABLE RELEASE of USAGI (UniverSAl playGround for Ipv6) on February 5th, 2001. On this release, we provide only kernel, but two kernels. One is linux-2.2.18-
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00026.html (11,257 bytes)

2. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:17:10 +0100
Better? You mean....? Is this really needed? It is a very good feature, that default route is not available when ipv6 forwarding (most of IPv6 address space should never be forwarded by a default rou
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00028.html (10,166 bytes)

3. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 18:22:45 +0900
If you have IPv6 addresses on a interface, a better source address is selected automatically. For routers in default free zone, it is true. But how about routers in leaf sites ? All router should hav
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00029.html (10,043 bytes)

4. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Philip Blundell <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:31:04 +0000
I don't see why not. A leaf site's provider ought to be able to aggregate the routes sufficiently that there would only be a manageable number. p.
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00030.html (8,760 bytes)

5. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 18:39:08 +0900
but behavior of NLAs and SLAs are not defined. Then I think it is reasonable that we can choice whether purging default route or not. -- Yuji Sekiya @ USAGI Project
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00031.html (9,749 bytes)

6. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:58:22 +0100
No just a route for all unicast addresses: 2000::/3 (AFAIR) And (maybe) something similar for multicast (if no better multicast routing is available) Greets, Jacek
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00032.html (9,658 bytes)

7. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 19:20:07 +0900
Actually it means default route. I can't see why you announce or add statically the route instead of default route. -- Yuji Sekiya
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00033.html (10,130 bytes)

8. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:32:36 +0100
This is not the same as default route. Prefix 2000::/3 does not contain multicast nor link-local and site-local addresses. Only global unicast addresses. When using default route you should (but I am
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00034.html (10,714 bytes)

9. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 17:04:46 +0900
Have you ever seen IPv6 routing table ?? 8) In routing table, default routes for multicast and link-local address exist. fe80::/10 :: UA 256 0 0 eth0 ff00::/8 :: UA 256 0 0 eth0 So if a default route
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00045.html (10,662 bytes)

10. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Lutchansky <lutchann@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 10:59:57 -0500 (EST)
Will the patch for 2.4.0 apply to 2.4.1? Or are you planning to release a 2.4.1 snap soon? -Nathan -- +--+--+--+ +--+ +--+
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00047.html (9,597 bytes)

11. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Peter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 18:44:55 +0100
Will the patch for 2.4.0 apply to 2.4.1? Or are you planning to release a 2.4.1 snap soon? -Nathan Current patch will work on 2.4.1, too. Also the 2.2.18 works on 2.2.19pre8 (tested yesterday!) Peter
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00048.html (9,828 bytes)

12. [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: USAGI Project <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 17:15:08 +0900
Hello ! We are glad that we can announce the 2nd STABLE RELEASE of USAGI (UniverSAl playGround for Ipv6) on February 5th, 2001. On this release, we provide only kernel, but two kernels. One is linux-
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00268.html (11,362 bytes)

13. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:17:10 +0100
Better? You mean....? Is this really needed? It is a very good feature, that default route is not available when ipv6 forwarding (most of IPv6 address space should never be forwarded by a default rou
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00270.html (10,248 bytes)

14. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 18:22:45 +0900
If you have IPv6 addresses on a interface, a better source address is selected automatically. For routers in default free zone, it is true. But how about routers in leaf sites ? All router should hav
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00271.html (10,119 bytes)

15. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Philip Blundell <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 09:31:04 +0000
I don't see why not. A leaf site's provider ought to be able to aggregate the routes sufficiently that there would only be a manageable number. p.
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00272.html (8,779 bytes)

16. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 18:39:08 +0900
but behavior of NLAs and SLAs are not defined. Then I think it is reasonable that we can choice whether purging default route or not. -- Yuji Sekiya @ USAGI Project
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00273.html (9,818 bytes)

17. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 10:58:22 +0100
No just a route for all unicast addresses: 2000::/3 (AFAIR) And (maybe) something similar for multicast (if no better multicast routing is available) Greets, Jacek
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00274.html (9,788 bytes)

18. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2001 19:20:07 +0900
Actually it means default route. I can't see why you announce or add statically the route instead of default route. -- Yuji Sekiya
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00275.html (10,254 bytes)

19. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 11:32:36 +0100
This is not the same as default route. Prefix 2000::/3 does not contain multicast nor link-local and site-local addresses. Only global unicast addresses. When using default route you should (but I am
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00276.html (10,894 bytes)

20. Re: [ANN] 2nd STABLE release of USAGI Project (score: 1)
Author: Yuji Sekiya <sekiya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 17:04:46 +0900
Have you ever seen IPv6 routing table ?? 8) In routing table, default routes for multicast and link-local address exist. fe80::/10 :: UA 256 0 0 eth0 ff00::/8 :: UA 256 0 0 eth0 So if a default route
/archives/netdev/2001-02/msg00287.html (10,835 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu