Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AH6\]\s+Rearrange\s+routing\s+headers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[AH6\]\s+Rearrange\s+routing\s+headers\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: hfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:37:09 +1000; This patch rearranges the IPv6 routing header so that the destination addresses appear in the order as they would on the destination. This is specified in Appendix A2 of RFC 2402. Signed-off-by: Her; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00559.html (8,551 bytes)
2. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: atocka <mikulas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:22:22 +0900; I saw roughly the packet. It needs to check direction of the process. We don't need to do that in INBOUND. --Kazunori Miyazawa; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00564.html (8,720 bytes)
3. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: ell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:22:03 -0400 (EDT); Here's the patch (on top of the Xu's patch). Signed-off-by: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- linux26/net/ipv6/ah6.c 2004-07-24 13:53:08.000000000 -0400 +++ linux26/net/ipv6/ah6.c 2004-0; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00566.html (11,646 bytes)
4. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: nori@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:10:03 +0900; To process routing header correctly, we should fix the codes which calls ip6_dst_lookup in ipv6 because there is difference of destinatio addresses for routing resolution and looking up xfrm_policy.; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00567.html (8,887 bytes)
5. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:31:58 +1000; This is unnecessary because if we're calling this from ah6_input(), then Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: ht; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00568.html (9,394 bytes)
6. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:03:47 +1000; What do you mean? Isn't the code in icmp.c/raw.c/tcp_ipv6.c/udp.c that sets fl.fl6_dst using opt->srcrt enough? If not then we'll need to change IPv4 as well. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00578.html (9,210 bytes)
7. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:32:13 +0900; routing is looked up with srcrt but xfrm is looked up with final destination, isn't it? we have the codes in our repository. sorry, I'm goring back to home from OLS2004. I'll send the patch when I wi; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00580.html (9,312 bytes)
8. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: ert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:26:12 +0300; We are not doing this in ipv4 either. But it makes sense to do xfrm lookup based on the final destination. --Mika; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00581.html (10,057 bytes)
9. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: t Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:16:41 +1000; You're right. I only skimmed through the code and took the presence of code that dealt with the option/extension header as evidence that it did the right thing :) So both IPv4 and IPv6 are broken in; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg00582.html (9,545 bytes)
10. [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 18:37:09 +1000; Hi: This patch rearranges the IPv6 routing header so that the destination addresses appear in the order as they would on the destination. This is specified in Appendix A2 of RFC 2402. Signed-off-by:; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01375.html (8,596 bytes)
11. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: Kazunori Miyazawa <kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 02:22:22 +0900; I saw roughly the packet. It needs to check direction of the process. We don't need to do that in INBOUND. --Kazunori Miyazawa; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01380.html (8,778 bytes)
12. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:22:03 -0400 (EDT); Here's the patch (on top of the Xu's patch). Signed-off-by: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- linux26/net/ipv6/ah6.c 2004-07-24 13:53:08.000000000 -0400 +++ linux26/net/ipv6/ah6.c 2004-0; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01382.html (11,745 bytes)
13. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: Kazunori Miyazawa <kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:10:03 +0900; To process routing header correctly, we should fix the codes which calls ip6_dst_lookup in ipv6 because there is difference of destinatio addresses for routing resolution and looking up xfrm_policy.; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01383.html (8,945 bytes)
14. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:31:58 +1000; This is unnecessary because if we're calling this from ah6_input(), then Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Page: ht; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01384.html (9,585 bytes)
15. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:03:47 +1000; What do you mean? Isn't the code in icmp.c/raw.c/tcp_ipv6.c/udp.c that sets fl.fl6_dst using opt->srcrt enough? If not then we'll need to change IPv4 as well. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01394.html (9,354 bytes)
16. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: Kazunori Miyazawa <kazunori@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 15:32:13 +0900; routing is looked up with srcrt but xfrm is looked up with final destination, isn't it? we have the codes in our repository. sorry, I'm goring back to home from OLS2004. I'll send the patch when I wi; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01396.html (9,436 bytes)
17. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: Mika Penttila" <mika.penttila@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:26:12 +0300; We are not doing this in ipv4 either. But it makes sense to do xfrm lookup based on the final destination. --Mika; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01397.html (10,221 bytes)
18. Re: [AH6] Rearrange routing headers (score: 1): Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:16:41 +1000; You're right. I only skimmed through the code and took the presence of code that dealt with the option/extension header as evidence that it did the right thing :) So both IPv4 and IPv6 are broken in; /archives/netdev/2004-07/msg01398.html (9,754 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]