Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[9\/9\]\[PATCH\s+2\.6\]\s+Restructure\s+reset\s+code\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:59:20 +0200
Restructure code to make it easier to maintain. rhine_hw_init: resets chip, reloads eeprom rhine_chip_reset: chip reset + what used to be wait_for_reset rhine_reload_eeprom: reload eeprom, re-enable
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00021.html (17,051 bytes)

2. Re: [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 15:41:03 -0400
applied patches 1 through 8, rejected 9 (for now)
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00034.html (9,005 bytes)

3. Re: [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:30:26 +0200
We are in violent agreement, you are describing what the driver does with and without patch 9 (unless I seriously botched the splitting). Incidentally, rhine_hw_init gets called only once, at probe t
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00061.html (11,282 bytes)

4. Re: [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: xxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:40:27 -0700
Sending the patches would be a good start ;)
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00344.html (9,468 bytes)

5. Re: [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: .herbert@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:00:35 +0200
I would have to rediff and fix them all against a driver without patch [9/9] from the previous series. ATM I can't see a good reason for doing that since for everything I know, that patch was perfect
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00348.html (9,970 bytes)

6. Re: [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: k Jr <mitch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:03:26 +0200
[...] I addressed your concerns in my June 2 reply, but the patch didn't get merged. Meanwhile, I am maintaining a growing queue of via-rhine patches that need review and wider testing -- what is mis
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00356.html (9,975 bytes)

7. [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:59:20 +0200
Restructure code to make it easier to maintain. rhine_hw_init: resets chip, reloads eeprom rhine_chip_reset: chip reset + what used to be wait_for_reset rhine_reload_eeprom: reload eeprom, re-enable
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00905.html (17,081 bytes)

8. Re: [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 15:41:03 -0400
applied patches 1 through 8, rejected 9 (for now)
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00918.html (9,059 bytes)

9. Re: [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 22:30:26 +0200
We are in violent agreement, you are describing what the driver does with and without patch 9 (unless I seriously botched the splitting). Incidentally, rhine_hw_init gets called only once, at probe t
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg00945.html (11,416 bytes)

10. Re: [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 03:40:27 -0700
Sending the patches would be a good start ;)
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01228.html (9,610 bytes)

11. Re: [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 13:00:35 +0200
I would have to rediff and fix them all against a driver without patch [9/9] from the previous series. ATM I can't see a good reason for doing that since for everything I know, that patch was perfect
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01232.html (10,154 bytes)

12. Re: [9/9][PATCH 2.6] Restructure reset code (score: 1)
Author: Roger Luethi <rl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:03:26 +0200
[...] I addressed your concerns in my June 2 reply, but the patch didn't get merged. Meanwhile, I am maintaining a growing queue of via-rhine patches that need review and wider testing -- what is mis
/archives/netdev/2004-06/msg01240.html (10,109 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu