Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[2\.6\.10\-rc2\]\s+XFS\s+filesystem\s+corruption\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:28:20 +0100
Hello lists, [Please CC all answers from linux-xfs to me, since I'm not subscribed on that list] Yesterday I encountered an on-the-fly corruption of my /home filesystem. It worked perfectly one secon
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00106.html (15,454 bytes)

2. [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:30:29 +0100
Hello lists, [resend with correct email address for LKML] [Please CC all answers from linux-xfs to me, since I'm not subscribed on that list] Yesterday I encountered an on-the-fly corruption of my /h
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00107.html (15,694 bytes)

3. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:51:06 -0800
I don't have any ideas at the moment, but please cc: me also. I'd like to watch for issues I do understand as this bug's nature is clarified. -- wli
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00108.html (9,627 bytes)

4. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:34:28 -0600
The trigger was a bad magic number related to directories... hard to say what happened in the first place. Can you send the output from xfs_repair, that might offer some hints. Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00110.html (8,751 bytes)

5. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:36:32 +0100
Sorry, but as a repair was very urgent, I didn't really think of saving the xfs_repair output.. My bad I guess. Jan -- The seven year itch comes from fooling around during the fourth, fifth, and sixt
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00118.html (9,316 bytes)

6. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:13:18 +0100
William Lee Irwin III wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 03:30:29PM +0100, Jan De Luyck wrote: [resend with correct email address for LKML] [Please CC all answers from linux-xfs to me, since I'm not subs
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00119.html (11,846 bytes)

7. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:13:43 -0500
Minor nitpick: Ingo wrote the preempt BKL code, not Con. Lee
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00125.html (9,187 bytes)

8. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:22:32 +0100
Lee Revell schrieb: On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 11:13 +0100, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: Is xfs known to be broken while preempt is on? (Esp using ck's preemp big kernel lock?) Minor nitpick: Ingo wrote
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00127.html (10,141 bytes)

9. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: c@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 08:27:36 +1100
Nope. This looks like your driver passed an error back up to the filesystem while it was doing metadata IO and XFS chose to shut it down to prevent further damage. It's unlikely to be a preempt/xfs p
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00128.html (10,188 bytes)

10. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:04:01 +0100
Nathan Scott schrieb: On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:13:18AM +0100, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: using ck's preemp big kernel lock?) I got following using a raid0 setup with xfs. I thought it would be a
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00134.html (10,980 bytes)

11. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 06:50:29 -0600
Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: Nathan Scott schrieb: Did you see any of those device errors since switching to ext3? No. That's why I am wondering. I read about such errors like I got before in lkml a
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00136.html (10,180 bytes)

12. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 08:28:38 +0100
Eric Sandeen schrieb: Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: Nathan Scott schrieb: Did you see any of those device errors since switching to ext3? No. That's why I am wondering. I read about such errors like
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00140.html (10,925 bytes)

13. [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: rĂ½ <ondrej@xxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:28:20 +0100
Hello lists, [Please CC all answers from linux-xfs to me, since I'm not subscribed on that list] Yesterday I encountered an on-the-fly corruption of my /home filesystem. It worked perfectly one secon
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00276.html (15,454 bytes)

14. [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: yck <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 15:30:29 +0100
Hello lists, [resend with correct email address for LKML] [Please CC all answers from linux-xfs to me, since I'm not subscribed on that list] Yesterday I encountered an on-the-fly corruption of my /h
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00277.html (15,694 bytes)

15. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: yck <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 07:51:06 -0800
I don't have any ideas at the moment, but please cc: me also. I'd like to watch for issues I do understand as this bug's nature is clarified. -- wli
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00278.html (9,627 bytes)

16. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: en <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:34:28 -0600
The trigger was a bad magic number related to directories... hard to say what happened in the first place. Can you send the output from xfs_repair, that might offer some hints. Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00280.html (8,751 bytes)

17. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: tt <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:36:32 +0100
Sorry, but as a repair was very urgent, I didn't really think of saving the xfs_repair output.. My bad I guess. Jan -- The seven year itch comes from fooling around during the fourth, fifth, and sixt
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00288.html (9,316 bytes)

18. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: yck <lkml@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:13:18 +0100
William Lee Irwin III wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 03:30:29PM +0100, Jan De Luyck wrote: [resend with correct email address for LKML] [Please CC all answers from linux-xfs to me, since I'm not subs
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00289.html (11,846 bytes)

19. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: rton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:13:43 -0500
Minor nitpick: Ingo wrote the preempt BKL code, not Con. Lee
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00295.html (9,187 bytes)

20. Re: [2.6.10-rc2] XFS filesystem corruption (score: 1)
Author: Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:22:32 +0100
Lee Revell schrieb: On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 11:13 +0100, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote: Is xfs known to be broken while preempt is on? (Esp using ck's preemp big kernel lock?) Minor nitpick: Ingo wrote
/archives/xfs/2004-11/msg00297.html (10,141 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu