Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[\[PATCH\,\s+RESEND\]\]\s+less\s+AGs\s+for\s+single\s+disks\s+configs\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[\[PATCH\,\s+RESEND\]\]\s+less\s+AGs\s+for\s+single\s+disks\s+configs\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [[PATCH, RESEND]] less AGs for single disks configs. (score: 1): Author: xaiki@xxxxxxx; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:48:49 +1100; get the underlying structure with get_subvol_stripe_wrapper(), and pass sunit | swidth as an argument to calc_default_ag_geometry(). if it is set, get the AG sizes bigger. this also cleans up a typo:; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00109.html (12,328 bytes)
2. Re: [[PATCH, RESEND]] less AGs for single disks configs. (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:01:47 +1100; No need to mention that you are cleaning up a typo in the description ;) Ok, so now we end up with half the number of allocation groups at these different sizes. That's not exactly what I had in mind; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00116.html (13,536 bytes)
3. Re: [[PATCH, RESEND]] less AGs for single disks configs. (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:57:21 -0500 (EST); On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, David Chinner wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:48:49PM +1100, xaiki@xxxxxxx wrote: From: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx> get the underlying structure with get_subvol_stripe_wrapper(),; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00119.html (14,423 bytes)
4. Re: [[PATCH, RESEND]] less AGs for single disks configs. (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:31:47 +1100; No. If you are having performance problems, then changing the way the filesystem is laid out *may* improve performance but if everything is working fine then don't change it. On a single disk, yes. O; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00123.html (12,646 bytes)
5. [[PATCH, RESEND]] less AGs for single disks configs. (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:48:49 +1100; get the underlying structure with get_subvol_stripe_wrapper(), and pass sunit | swidth as an argument to calc_default_ag_geometry(). if it is set, get the AG sizes bigger. this also cleans up a typo:; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00425.html (12,328 bytes)
6. Re: [[PATCH, RESEND]] less AGs for single disks configs. (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:01:47 +1100; No need to mention that you are cleaning up a typo in the description ;) Ok, so now we end up with half the number of allocation groups at these different sizes. That's not exactly what I had in mind; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00432.html (13,536 bytes)
7. Re: [[PATCH, RESEND]] less AGs for single disks configs. (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:57:21 -0500 (EST); On Mon, 12 Nov 2007, David Chinner wrote: On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 02:48:49PM +1100, xaiki@xxxxxxx wrote: From: Niv Sardi <xaiki@xxxxxxx> get the underlying structure with get_subvol_stripe_wrapper(),; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00435.html (14,423 bytes)
8. Re: [[PATCH, RESEND]] less AGs for single disks configs. (score: 1): Author:; Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:31:47 +1100; No. If you are having performance problems, then changing the way the filesystem is laid out *may* improve performance but if everything is working fine then don't change it. On a single disk, yes. O; /archives/xfs/2007-11/msg00439.html (12,646 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]