Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\"xfs_io\s+\-c\s+chattr\s+\+i\s+\"\s+on\s+a\s+symlink\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Am" <xfs@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:26:56 +0200 (CEST)
(resend, since I used the wrong account to send the initial mail, sorry) Dear list, I am trying to make a symlink immutable with chattr, however the command seems to follow the link, which point to a
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00017.html (8,685 bytes)

2. "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: "Daniel Amthor" <da@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:18:40 +0200 (CEST)
Dear list, I am trying to make a symlink immutable with chattr, however the command seems to follow the link, which point to a NFS Mount. Setting xattr works on symlink btw, which is useful. More dat
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00018.html (8,799 bytes)

3. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:13:07 -0500
Dan Am wrote: (resend, since I used the wrong account to send the initial mail, sorry) Dear list, I am trying to make a symlink immutable with chattr, however the command seems to follow the link, wh
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00019.html (10,309 bytes)

4. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:29:50 +1000
Or not. :) ... I think you just set immutable on /tmp. Try a broken symlink, instead of one that points to an existing inode. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00022.html (9,679 bytes)

5. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:28:14 +1000
Its not possible to open(2) a symbolic link (see fs/namei.c::may_open), which means you cannot get a file descriptor for a symlink, which means you cannot issue an ioctl(2) to a symlink (which is how
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00023.html (9,282 bytes)

6. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:38:21 -0500
Nathan Scott wrote: On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:13:07AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: Try just using chattr. Or not. :) Whoops, oh well. Shoulda investigated a bit more I guess :) -Eric
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00024.html (9,292 bytes)

7. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:20:03 -0700
I always disliked open/ioctl for this. I think we should actually have a separate syscall for chattr, etc. (FreeBSD does this I think?)
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00025.html (9,112 bytes)

8. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Am" <xfs@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:15:19 +0200 (CEST)
a separate syscall for chattr, etc. (FreeBSD does this I think?) So how does "attr -s someAttribute symlink" work ? This does the job very well, distinguishing it from other filesystems. Best Dan
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00027.html (8,335 bytes)

9. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:13:17 +1000
So how does "attr -s someAttribute symlink" work ? This does the job very well, distinguishing it from other filesystems. attr(1) sets the extended attribute and they are set by system calls. It look
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00028.html (9,640 bytes)

10. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Am" <xfs@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 13:37:32 +0200 (CEST)
Nope: /data/tara-test > ls -l test lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 13 Aug 4 13:33 test -> /archive/no-such-file /data/tara-test > xfs_io -c "chattr +i" test test: No such file or directory Best Regards Dan
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00031.html (9,200 bytes)

11. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:54:43 +1000
Eh? Right, that was my point. As I said, you're out of luck - there is currently no way to do what you want. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00049.html (9,633 bytes)

12. "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:26:56 +0200 (CEST)
(resend, since I used the wrong account to send the initial mail, sorry) Dear list, I am trying to make a symlink immutable with chattr, however the command seems to follow the link, which point to a
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00269.html (8,685 bytes)

13. "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:18:40 +0200 (CEST)
Dear list, I am trying to make a symlink immutable with chattr, however the command seems to follow the link, which point to a NFS Mount. Setting xattr works on symlink btw, which is useful. More dat
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00270.html (8,799 bytes)

14. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:13:07 -0500
Dan Am wrote: (resend, since I used the wrong account to send the initial mail, sorry) Dear list, I am trying to make a symlink immutable with chattr, however the command seems to follow the link, wh
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00271.html (10,309 bytes)

15. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:29:50 +1000
Or not. :) ... I think you just set immutable on /tmp. Try a broken symlink, instead of one that points to an existing inode. cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00274.html (9,679 bytes)

16. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:28:14 +1000
Its not possible to open(2) a symbolic link (see fs/namei.c::may_open), which means you cannot get a file descriptor for a symlink, which means you cannot issue an ioctl(2) to a symlink (which is how
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00275.html (9,282 bytes)

17. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 21:38:21 -0500
Nathan Scott wrote: On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 09:13:07AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: Try just using chattr. Or not. :) Whoops, oh well. Shoulda investigated a bit more I guess :) -Eric
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00276.html (9,292 bytes)

18. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 21:20:03 -0700
I always disliked open/ioctl for this. I think we should actually have a separate syscall for chattr, etc. (FreeBSD does this I think?)
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00277.html (9,112 bytes)

19. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 10:15:19 +0200 (CEST)
a separate syscall for chattr, etc. (FreeBSD does this I think?) So how does "attr -s someAttribute symlink" work ? This does the job very well, distinguishing it from other filesystems. Best Dan
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00279.html (8,335 bytes)

20. Re: "xfs_io -c chattr +i " on a symlink (score: 1)
Author:
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 19:13:17 +1000
So how does "attr -s someAttribute symlink" work ? This does the job very well, distinguishing it from other filesystems. attr(1) sets the extended attribute and they are set by system calls. It look
/archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00280.html (9,640 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu