Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsrestore\s+fails\:\s+assertion\s+failure\s+in\s+do_next

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsrestore\s+fails\:\s+assertion\s+failure\s+in\s+do_next_mark\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. c64 (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:51:15 +1100; Hi guys, Thanks for the suggestion Daniel. Problem -- Yes this problem was fixed in xfsdump: xfsdump-1.1.10 (10 December 2001) - fix xfsdump to endian convert all of the record header fields properly; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00407.html (10,310 bytes)
2. sparc64 (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:51:15 +1100; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg00981.html (10,310 bytes)
3. e. Please reply off-list. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:00:18 +0100 (CET); On a Linux-i386 system I have created a tape backup with xfsdump 1.1.3. When trying to restore the backup, xfsdump 1.1.14 segfaults. I have then upgraded to the latest CVS version, which fails as we; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00891.html (7,928 bytes)
4. n failure in do_next_mark (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:05:13 +0100; from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4824257306; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:05:14 +0100 (CET) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG, B; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00892.html (9,288 bytes)
5. ted XFS 1.0.2 kernel RPMs for Red Hat systems (score: 1): Author: deen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:58:02 +0100 (CET); After some reading of the mailing list archives, I added the following at line 1481 in drive_scsitape.c (version 1.5): rechdrp->first_mark_offset = INT_GET(rechdrp->first_mark_offset,ARCH_CONVERT); T; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00900.html (8,269 bytes)
6. tore fails: assertion failure in do_next_mark (score: 1): Author: unruh@xxxxxxx; Date: 31 Jan 2002 12:59:53 -0600; I think, (but do not know since he is in Australia) that our dump/restore expert is out on vacation right now, so you may have to wait a while for a response on this one. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00901.html (8,819 bytes)
7. ch/CVS question (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:44:49 +1100; Tim is busy coming to grips with being a dad at the moment, he's expected back mid-February. cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg00910.html (8,482 bytes)
8. panic during reboot (score: 1): Author: ou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:00:18 +0100 (CET); On a Linux-i386 system I have created a tape backup with xfsdump 1.1.3. When trying to restore the backup, xfsdump 1.1.14 segfaults. I have then upgraded to the latest CVS version, which fails as we; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01820.html (7,928 bytes)
9. ase reply off-list. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:05:13 +0100; from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4824257306; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:05:14 +0100 (CET) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG, B; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01821.html (9,288 bytes)
10. th xfs during SPEC SFS testing (score: 1): Author: c Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:58:02 +0100 (CET); After some reading of the mailing list archives, I added the following at line 1481 in drive_scsitape.c (version 1.5): rechdrp->first_mark_offset = INT_GET(rechdrp->first_mark_offset,ARCH_CONVERT); T; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01829.html (8,269 bytes)
11. 0.2 kernel RPMs for Red Hat systems (score: 1): Author: deen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 31 Jan 2002 12:59:53 -0600; I think, (but do not know since he is in Australia) that our dump/restore expert is out on vacation right now, so you may have to wait a while for a response on this one. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01830.html (8,819 bytes)
12. n (score: 1): Author: on <laytonjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:44:49 +1100; Tim is busy coming to grips with being a dad at the moment, he's expected back mid-February. cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg01839.html (8,482 bytes)
13. Re: xfsrestore fails: assertion failure in do_next_mark (score: 1): Author: Timothy Shimmin <tes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:51:15 +1100; Hi guys, Thanks for the suggestion Daniel. Problem -- Yes this problem was fixed in xfsdump: xfsdump-1.1.10 (10 December 2001) - fix xfsdump to endian convert all of the record header fields properly; /archives/xfs/2002-02/msg01555.html (10,530 bytes)
14. xfsrestore fails: assertion failure in do_next_mark (score: 1): Author: unruh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:00:18 +0100 (CET); Hello! On a Linux-i386 system I have created a tape backup with xfsdump 1.1.3. When trying to restore the backup, xfsdump 1.1.14 segfaults. I have then upgraded to the latest CVS version, which fails; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02749.html (7,928 bytes)
15. Re: xfsrestore fails: assertion failure in do_next_mark (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:05:13 +0100; from mobile.sauter-bc.com (unknown [10.1.6.21]) by basel1.sauter-bc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4824257306; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:05:14 +0100 (CET) Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx Organization: Sauter AG, B; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02750.html (9,323 bytes)
16. Re: xfsrestore fails: assertion failure in do_next_mark (score: 1): Author: unruh@xxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:58:02 +0100 (CET); After some reading of the mailing list archives, I added the following at line 1481 in drive_scsitape.c (version 1.5): rechdrp->first_mark_offset = INT_GET(rechdrp->first_mark_offset,ARCH_CONVERT); T; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02758.html (8,309 bytes)
17. Re: xfsrestore fails: assertion failure in do_next_mark (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 31 Jan 2002 12:59:53 -0600; I think, (but do not know since he is in Australia) that our dump/restore expert is out on vacation right now, so you may have to wait a while for a response on this one. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02759.html (8,889 bytes)
18. Re: xfsrestore fails: assertion failure in do_next_mark (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 08:44:49 +1100; Tim is busy coming to grips with being a dad at the moment, he's expected back mid-February. cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2002-01/msg02768.html (8,625 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]