- 1. xfsprogs-3.1.11 pre-release please test! (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:01:23 -0500
- Hi Folks, Here are the changes for this release: xfsprogs-3.1.11 (30 April 2013) - Support for relative paths in xfs_quota thanks to Satoru Takeuchi. - mkfs.xfs will always go into multidisk mode whe
- /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00668.html (9,067 bytes)
- 2. xfsprogs-3.1.11 pre-release please test! (score: 1)
- Author: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 15:12:02 -0500
- Hi Folks, Here are the changes for this release: xfsprogs-3.1.11 (30 April 2013) - Support for relative paths in xfs_quota thanks to Satoru Takeuchi. - mkfs.xfs will always go into multidisk mode whe
- /archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00031.html (9,958 bytes)
- 3. Re: xfsprogs-3.1.11 pre-release please test! (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 15:35:20 -0500
- Here are the changes for this release: xfsprogs-3.1.11 (30 April 2013) - Support for relative paths in xfs_quota thanks to Satoru Takeuchi. - mkfs.xfs will always go into multidisk mode when filesyst
- /archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00033.html (10,795 bytes)
- 4. Re: xfsprogs-3.1.11 pre-release please test! (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 16:01:46 -0500
- Hum, I thought xfstests stopped calling xfs_check.sh and implemented its own xfs_check internally: xfstests: Remove dependence of xfs_check script Replace the usage of the script xfs_check and add th
- /archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00035.html (12,825 bytes)
- 5. Re: xfsprogs-3.1.11 pre-release please test! (score: 1)
- Author: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 16:17:45 -0500
- On 05/01/13 16:01, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 5/1/13 3:35 PM, Mark Tinguely wrote: On 05/01/13 15:12, Rich Johnston wrote: Hi Folks, Here are the changes for this release: xfsprogs-3.1.11 (30 April 2013)
- /archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00036.html (11,943 bytes)
- 6. Re: xfsprogs-3.1.11 pre-release please test! (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 16:23:28 -0500
- Sorry, I missed that. So what's the proposed solution? ;) TBH I think xfstests is the kind of thing that is in so much flux you should always assume you need a newer version. And since it's mostly qe
- /archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00037.html (14,060 bytes)
- 7. Re: xfsprogs-3.1.11 pre-release please test! (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 08:10:07 +1000
- Upgrade xfstests. That has always been the case. Given the number of people that are likely to hit this, then I think leaving it as it stands is just fine. The expectation is that you should be using
- /archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00039.html (11,909 bytes)
- 8. Re: xfsprogs-3.1.11 pre-release please test! (score: 1)
- Author: "Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 09:34:42 -0400
- Here are the changes for this release: xfsprogs-3.1.11 (30 April 2013) - Support for relative paths in xfs_quota thanks to Satoru Takeuchi. - mkfs.xfs will always go into multidisk mode when filesyst
- /archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00068.html (13,636 bytes)
- 9. Re: xfsprogs-3.1.11 pre-release please test! (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 09:45:29 -0500
- Please take a look and report any issues before next Wednesday (08 May I'll send a patch. xfstests is planning ahead. ;) Nothing stops the end-user from dropping a tool before the ultimate deprecatio
- /archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00074.html (14,494 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu