Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsdump\s+segfaults\,\s+xfs

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsdump\s+segfaults\,\s+xfs_repair\s+suffers\s+fatality\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. xfsdump segfaults, xfs_repair suffers fatality (score: 1): Author: Kacper Wysocki <kacperw@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 06:47:28 -0400; .com/projects/xfs/download/cmd_rpms instead of the ones in 1.2pre1. But switching to them does not make any difference. I also see a xfs; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00276.html (9,694 bytes)
2. s: root xfs filesystem executable bits bug comeback?) (score: 1): Author: n <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 06:47:28 -0400; issions, which is erroneous. you can see the acls with the following: getfattr -m . file you will see a system; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01055.html (9,694 bytes)
3. xfsdump segfaults, xfs_repair suffers fatality (score: 1): Author: Kacper Wysocki <kacperw@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 06:47:28 -0400; Hi, I'm running a hardware raid 0 system with 10 disks, one of which recently(er, today) failed. This was a good 40GB of data on a 70GB logical drive, and it's all striped, which usually means it's a; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01834.html (9,910 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]