Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsdump\,\s+paride\s+tape\,\s+and\s+\-m\s+option\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*xfsdump\,\s+paride\s+tape\,\s+and\s+\-m\s+option\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 03:34:53 -0600 (MDT); I'm using xfsdump from cvs (I think it is from 5/30/01 but might be 6/5/01) to attempt to backup an xfs filesystem to an HP Colorado 8GBe parallel tape drive. Every time I try to use the -m option (t; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00204.html (7,964 bytes)
2. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 22:54:51 -0600 (MDT); okie dokie, here's what I was giving it: xfsdump -m -b 16 -o -l0 -E -F -M"gumby" -L"home" -s home -f /dev/pt/0 / Like I said its a parallel tape drive that I haven't got anything else to work with ei; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00247.html (9,365 bytes)
3. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner); Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 15:09:37 +1000; The argument to -b should be bytes, so 16k would be 16384 not 16. If this doesn't fix your problem, could you use -v5 to get verbose output. (This might produce alot of output, so you should redirect; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00248.html (9,819 bytes)
4. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 13:58:20 -0600 (MDT); It wasn't clear (to me anyway) what the syntax on the -b option was supposed to be to get 16k blocksize, so thanks. I'll give it a try sometime tomorrow and get back to ya. -- Russ Ingram Gargoyle Co; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00250.html (10,321 bytes)
5. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner); Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 15:24:24 +1000; Agreed. I'll update the man page next week. Ivan -- Ivan Rayner ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00251.html (8,468 bytes)
6. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 03:11:43 -0600 (MDT); Ok, I ran it again with the right sysntax on the -b option. Here's the command I gave it: xfsdump -v5 -m -b 32k -o -F -E -l0 -M"gumby" -L"tmp" -f /dev/tape -s tmp / It still core dumped with the same; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00257.html (10,856 bytes)
7. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner); Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:07:39 +1000; The argument to -b should be bytes, so 32k would be '32768' not '32k'. Let me know if this helps. Ivan -- Ivan Rayner ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00343.html (8,596 bytes)
8. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:58:24 -0600 (MDT); I am still having trouble getting the drive itself to work right so it's becoming more and more likely that this is a hardware problem rather than an xfsdump problem, but even with the correct syntax; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00370.html (9,244 bytes)
9. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner); Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:32:43 +1000; These errors indicate that xfsdq/xfsrq weren't installed. If you want your quota information included in the dump, you should install them. I think they're part of the xfsdump package. If you don't c; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00430.html (9,835 bytes)
10. xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 03:34:53 -0600 (MDT); I'm using xfsdump from cvs (I think it is from 5/30/01 but might be 6/5/01) to attempt to backup an xfs filesystem to an HP Colorado 8GBe parallel tape drive. Every time I try to use the -m option (t; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01374.html (7,964 bytes)
11. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 22:54:51 -0600 (MDT); okie dokie, here's what I was giving it: xfsdump -m -b 16 -o -l0 -E -F -M"gumby" -L"home" -s home -f /dev/pt/0 / Like I said its a parallel tape drive that I haven't got anything else to work with ei; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01417.html (9,365 bytes)
12. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner); Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 15:09:37 +1000; The argument to -b should be bytes, so 16k would be 16384 not 16. If this doesn't fix your problem, could you use -v5 to get verbose output. (This might produce alot of output, so you should redirect; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01418.html (9,819 bytes)
13. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 13:58:20 -0600 (MDT); It wasn't clear (to me anyway) what the syntax on the -b option was supposed to be to get 16k blocksize, so thanks. I'll give it a try sometime tomorrow and get back to ya. -- Russ Ingram Gargoyle Co; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01420.html (10,321 bytes)
14. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner); Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 15:24:24 +1000; Agreed. I'll update the man page next week. Ivan -- Ivan Rayner ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01421.html (8,468 bytes)
15. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 03:11:43 -0600 (MDT); Ok, I ran it again with the right sysntax on the -b option. Here's the command I gave it: xfsdump -v5 -m -b 32k -o -F -E -l0 -M"gumby" -L"tmp" -f /dev/tape -s tmp / It still core dumped with the same; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01427.html (10,856 bytes)
16. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner); Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:07:39 +1000; The argument to -b should be bytes, so 32k would be '32768' not '32k'. Let me know if this helps. Ivan -- Ivan Rayner ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01513.html (8,596 bytes)
17. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: Russel Ingram <ringram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:58:24 -0600 (MDT); I am still having trouble getting the drive itself to work right so it's becoming more and more likely that this is a hardware problem rather than an xfsdump problem, but even with the correct syntax; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01540.html (9,244 bytes)
18. Re: xfsdump, paride tape, and -m option (score: 1): Author: ivanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ivan Rayner); Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:32:43 +1000; These errors indicate that xfsdq/xfsrq weren't installed. If you want your quota information included in the dump, you should install them. I think they're part of the xfsdump package. If you don't c; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01600.html (9,835 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]