Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*where\s+is\s+the\s+proper\s+place\s+for\s+r8169\s+bug\s+reports\?\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: "Dale E. Martin" <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:56:07 -0500

Yep, that was it. Recompiled with gcc 3.3 and it seems to be working now, although it looks like the card is only found on cold boots. The irony of this, btw, is that linux/Documentation/Changes sti

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00019.html (9,679 bytes)

2. Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 23:31:09 +0100

Dale E. Martin <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : Can you send (or put on a webpage) the same dmesg and lspci -vx when it happens ? You saw it there. No comment. I lost this one. Re-added to the queue. Don't b

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00022.html (9,436 bytes)

3. Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:13:33 +0100

- the 2.4.x backport has been rediffed against 2.4.29 (mostly harmless conflict in drivers/net/Config.in); - the driver compiles again when RTL8169_DEBUG is defined; - endianness fix in the Rx check

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00063.html (9,261 bytes)

4. icy router operates faster/better than V2.6 (score: 1)

Author: lte <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:15:08 -0500

1 18:36:11.524393024 +0100 +++ include/linux/sysct

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01457.html (7,307 bytes)

5. and ah hangs (problem is in xfrm_state_add) (score: 1)

Author: david@xxxxxxxx

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:49:51 +0100

do anyone have an idea how to get t

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01477.html (8,121 bytes)

6. is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:59:48 -0500

ally only acquiring a single SA. There

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01478.html (8,503 bytes)

7. CP ignores PMTU ICMP (Re: Linux 2.6.11-rc2) (score: 1)

Author: ukiemab@xxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:23:42 +0100

ed to a Netgear 8 port gigabit swit

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01480.html (8,731 bytes)

8. Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: "Dale E. Martin" <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:56:07 -0500

Yep, that was it. Recompiled with gcc 3.3 and it seems to be working now, although it looks like the card is only found on cold boots. The irony of this, btw, is that linux/Documentation/Changes sti

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01039.html (9,999 bytes)

9. Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 23:31:09 +0100

Dale E. Martin <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] Can you send (or put on a webpage) the same dmesg and lspci -vx when it happens ? You saw it there. No comment. I lost this one. Re-added to the queue. D

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01042.html (9,726 bytes)

10. Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 23:13:33 +0100

Re, - the 2.4.x backport has been rediffed against 2.4.29 (mostly harmless conflict in drivers/net/Config.in); - the driver compiles again when RTL8169_DEBUG is defined; - endianness fix in the Rx ch

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01083.html (9,625 bytes)

11. where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: "Dale E. Martin" <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:15:08 -0500

I'm having an issue with this driver in Linux 2.4.28. I'm happy to submit a full report and/or help debug if I know where to send the info. Thanks! Dale -- Dale E. Martin - dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http:

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02947.html (7,322 bytes)

12. Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:49:51 +0100

Dale E. Martin <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : You can send info here and open a PR at bugzilla.kernel.org. If you are using a 2.95.x compiler (wild guess), it would be well advised to upgrade. -- Ueimor

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02967.html (8,181 bytes)

13. Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: "Dale E. Martin" <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:59:48 -0500

OK. In general what I'm seeing is transmit timeout error that is locking the machine up when I try to run at gigabit speed. The board is a "Zonet" brand card, hooked to a Netgear 8 port gigabit swit

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02968.html (8,608 bytes)

14. Re: where is the proper place for r8169 bug reports? (score: 1)

Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:23:42 +0100

Dale E. Martin <dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] Typical symptoms: the card works fine until 64 (256) packets are sent (received) then "Good bye Charlie". If it works, I'll gladly welcome an 'lspci -vx'

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02970.html (8,866 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]