Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*update\s+packages\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*update\s+packages\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. update packages (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:02:23 +0900; I use Red Hat Linux 9 and XFS, installed from `forRH-9.0-SGI-XFS-1.2.0-v0.iso'. Recently, someone have found security hole in kernel 2.4 and Red Hat Inc. have released update kernel package(*1). So,; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00202.html (7,111 bytes)
2. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:18:11 +0200; Susumu Takuwa schrieb: Hi, Seth has kindly done it. Check here http://iserv.nl/files/xfs/2.4.20-13/ AFAIK he builds on RedHat 7.x, so you may want to rebuild on RedHat9. For RH9, it seems that you ma; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00203.html (8,386 bytes)
3. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:29:02 +0200; At 23:02 20-5-2003 +0900, Susumu Takuwa wrote: I use Red Hat Linux 9 and XFS, installed from `forRH-9.0-SGI-XFS-1.2.0-v0.iso'. Recently, someone have found security hole in kernel 2.4 and Red Hat Inc; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00204.html (8,546 bytes)
4. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 14:05:34 +0900; Thanks for your kind reply and package, Seth and Simon. After getting your source package, I have built it on Red Hat 9(Cerelon 433MHz). I' going to test new kernel for 2 or 3 days. When I have a pro; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00219.html (8,672 bytes)
5. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: 20 May 2003 12:47:03 -0700; Just be warned that, while these RH kernel updates seem to work very well on typical server hardware and installations, and seem to provide a significant performance boost over older kernels, there a; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00223.html (8,456 bytes)
6. update packages (score: 1): Author: rto@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:02:23 +0900; I use Red Hat Linux 9 and XFS, installed from `forRH-9.0-SGI-XFS-1.2.0-v0.iso'. Recently, someone have found security hole in kernel 2.4 and Red Hat Inc. have released update kernel package(*1). So,; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00509.html (7,111 bytes)
7. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:18:11 +0200; Susumu Takuwa schrieb: Hi, Seth has kindly done it. Check here http://iserv.nl/files/xfs/2.4.20-13/ AFAIK he builds on RedHat 7.x, so you may want to rebuild on RedHat9. For RH9, it seems that you ma; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00510.html (8,386 bytes)
8. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:29:02 +0200; At 23:02 20-5-2003 +0900, Susumu Takuwa wrote: I use Red Hat Linux 9 and XFS, installed from `forRH-9.0-SGI-XFS-1.2.0-v0.iso'. Recently, someone have found security hole in kernel 2.4 and Red Hat Inc; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00511.html (8,546 bytes)
9. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 14:05:34 +0900; Thanks for your kind reply and package, Seth and Simon. After getting your source package, I have built it on Red Hat 9(Cerelon 433MHz). I' going to test new kernel for 2 or 3 days. When I have a pro; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00526.html (8,672 bytes)
10. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 20 May 2003 12:47:03 -0700; Just be warned that, while these RH kernel updates seem to work very well on typical server hardware and installations, and seem to provide a significant performance boost over older kernels, there a; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00530.html (8,456 bytes)
11. update packages (score: 1): Author: Susumu Takuwa <susumu-t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:02:23 +0900; I use Red Hat Linux 9 and XFS, installed from `forRH-9.0-SGI-XFS-1.2.0-v0.iso'. Recently, someone have found security hole in kernel 2.4 and Red Hat Inc. have released update kernel package(*1). So,; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00816.html (7,126 bytes)
12. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:18:11 +0200; Susumu Takuwa schrieb: Hi, Seth has kindly done it. Check here http://iserv.nl/files/xfs/2.4.20-13/ AFAIK he builds on RedHat 7.x, so you may want to rebuild on RedHat9. For RH9, it seems that you ma; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00817.html (8,452 bytes)
13. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:29:02 +0200; At 23:02 20-5-2003 +0900, Susumu Takuwa wrote: I use Red Hat Linux 9 and XFS, installed from `forRH-9.0-SGI-XFS-1.2.0-v0.iso'. Recently, someone have found security hole in kernel 2.4 and Red Hat Inc; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00818.html (8,537 bytes)
14. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: Susumu Takuwa <susumu-t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 14:05:34 +0900; Thanks for your kind reply and package, Seth and Simon. After getting your source package, I have built it on Red Hat 9(Cerelon 433MHz). I' going to test new kernel for 2 or 3 days. When I have a pro; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00833.html (8,805 bytes)
15. Re: update packages (score: 1): Author: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>; Date: 20 May 2003 12:47:03 -0700; Just be warned that, while these RH kernel updates seem to work very well on typical server hardware and installations, and seem to provide a significant performance boost over older kernels, there a; /archives/xfs/2003-05/msg00837.html (8,543 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 15
Page: [1]