Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*unregister_netdev\s+Annoyance\s+WAS\(Re\:\s+ing_filter\s+debug\s+messages\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: unregister_netdev Annoyance WAS(Re: ing_filter debug messages (score: 1)

Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:13:49 +0100

This is a separate and known problem - see 'Re: Major deadlock: unregister_netdevice: waiting for <device> to become free. Usage count = 1' by Peter Bieringer. For some reason this issue has been wi

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00020.html (9,355 bytes)

2. Re: unregister_netdev Annoyance WAS(Re: ing_filter debug messages (score: 1)

Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: 03 Jan 2005 09:50:40 -0500

This issue was already being looked into by about 3 people {Dave, Yoshfuji-san, Herbert}. They have more knowledge about the circumstances than i do. The holidays are over, so give it a short time an

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00032.html (9,165 bytes)

3. in U32 classifier. (score: 1)

Author: xxxxx>

Date: 31 Dec 2004 11:48:17 -0500

ore the IDs. Although i am not sure you want to call it matches - rather its u32 program identifiers. I dont know, possible given how easy it would be to add a

/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00942.html (9,972 bytes)

4. in U32 classifier. (score: 1)

Author: xxxx>

Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:24:30 +0100

tance when dumping. For me there are two

/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00948.html (13,700 bytes)

5. Re: unregister_netdev Annoyance WAS(Re: ing_filter debug messages (score: 1)

Author: bert hubert <ahu@xxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:13:49 +0100

This is a separate and known problem - see 'Re: Major deadlock: unregister_netdevice: waiting for <device> to become free. Usage count = 1' by Peter Bieringer. For some reason this issue has been wi

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01510.html (9,921 bytes)

6. Re: unregister_netdev Annoyance WAS(Re: ing_filter debug messages (score: 1)

Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: 03 Jan 2005 09:50:40 -0500

This issue was already being looked into by about 3 people {Dave, Yoshfuji-san, Herbert}. They have more knowledge about the circumstances than i do. The holidays are over, so give it a short time an

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01522.html (9,700 bytes)

7. unregister_netdev Annoyance WAS(Re: ing_filter debug messages (score: 1)

Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: 31 Dec 2004 11:48:17 -0500

I am pretty sure its a different problem. Quick scan shows the register/unregister state machine may be at fault. Just changed the subject because there have been threads on this topic that other peo

/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01893.html (10,220 bytes)

8. Re: unregister_netdev Annoyance WAS(Re: ing_filter debug messages (score: 1)

Author: Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 19:24:30 +0100

Try also the attached patch with netfilter on and your rules installed. That seems to do the trick: I no longer see the debug messages appear. The tunnel still works as well. However, the unregister

/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01899.html (13,832 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]