Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*the\s+shell\s+will\s+make\s+the\s+xfs\s+fs\s+locked\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*the\s+shell\s+will\s+make\s+the\s+xfs\s+fs\s+locked\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: tom wang <wddi_1976@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 17:24:16 +0800 (CST); when I run the shell program as following on a xfs FS, the process will locked. for((i=0;i<300000;i++)); do truncate /mnt/current/a $(($i*8192)); cat /tmp/4kfile >> /mnt/current/a done /tmp/4kfile i; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00000.html (7,798 bytes)
2. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Oct 2002 16:38:23 -0500; We're looking at the problem here, and we can duplicate it. It will be a hard problem to solve, but the main problem is that you are creating so many extents in the file. If you do not create so many; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00039.html (9,761 bytes)
3. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: tom wang <wddi_1976@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:27:32 +0800 (CST); Hope you will be soon fix this problem. because we are now testing xfs filesystem and decide wether use xfs as the file server in our product. thanks. -- Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> 的正文：> We're lo; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00041.html (10,577 bytes)
4. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Oct 2002 20:40:40 -0500; e're lo; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00042.html (11,871 bytes)
5. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 03:49:57 +0200; of. As; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00043.html (9,011 bytes)
6. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: tom wang <wddi_1976@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:04:38 +0800 (CST); ? -Andi; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00044.html (9,032 bytes)
7. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 11 Oct 2002 15:42:37 -0500; : bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:129773a linux/fs/xfs/xfsidbg.c - 1.206 - add xalmtrc kdb command; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00255.html (9,528 bytes)
8. te (score: 1): Author: <cmail11jp@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 17:24:16 +0800 (CST); explanation. I have just done a xfsdump level 0, so everything should be clean now. Greg Greg Freemyer Internet Engineer Deployment and Integration Specialist Compaq ASE - Tr; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00779.html (7,798 bytes)
9. m. (score: 1): Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Oct 2002 16:38:23 -0500; were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.5.x-xfs Modid: 2.5.x-xfs:slinx:128913a linux/fs/xfs/linux/xfs_super.c - 1.230 - Remove dead variable in linvfs_put_super.; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00818.html (9,761 bytes)
10. Remove dead variable. (score: 1): Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:27:32 +0800 (CST); bugging code' which has been there a couple of years at least. The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:12891; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00820.html (10,577 bytes)
11. to generate a kdev_t (score: 1): Author: wddi_1976@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Oct 2002 20:40:40 -0500; lem here, and we can duplicate it. It will be a hard problem to solve, but the main problem is that you are creating so many extents in the file. If you do not create so many; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00821.html (11,871 bytes)
12. ary debugging code' (score: 1): Author: hen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 03:49:57 +0200; o recover deleted xfs files, I am afraid. http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#undelete If these were text files that were deleted, and they were not very fragmented, and; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00822.html (9,011 bytes)
13. e the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:04:38 +0800 (CST); not very fragmented, and; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00823.html (9,032 bytes)
14. s_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1): Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 11 Oct 2002 15:42:37 -0500; in xlog_find_tail, in linux/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c if (!readonly) error = xlog_clear_stale_blocks(log, t; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01034.html (9,528 bytes)
15. the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: tom wang <wddi_1976@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 17:24:16 +0800 (CST); xfs-developers: when I run the shell program as following on a xfs FS, the process will locked. for((i=0;i<300000;i++)); do truncate /mnt/current/a $(($i*8192)); cat /tmp/4kfile >> /mnt/current/a don; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01558.html (7,813 bytes)
16. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Oct 2002 16:38:23 -0500; We're looking at the problem here, and we can duplicate it. It will be a hard problem to solve, but the main problem is that you are creating so many extents in the file. If you do not create so many; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01597.html (9,889 bytes)
17. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: tom wang <wddi_1976@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 09:27:32 +0800 (CST); Hope you will be soon fix this problem. because we are now testing xfs filesystem and decide wether use xfs as the file server in our product. thanks. -- Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx> > We're lookin; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01599.html (10,675 bytes)
18. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Oct 2002 20:40:40 -0500; The particular scenario you are testing created 64K extents in a file before it died here. What you are doing here does not bear a lot of resemblance to any reasonable application I can think of. As; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01600.html (11,984 bytes)
19. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 03:49:57 +0200; It still looks like a kind of security/DoS problem. Is there a simple way to check for the condition and -EINVAL or EIO in this case at least ? -Andi; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01601.html (9,107 bytes)
20. Re: the shell will make the xfs fs locked (score: 1): Author: tom wang <wddi_1976@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:04:38 +0800 (CST); -- Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> > On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:40:40PM -0500, Steve Lord yeah. error messages and error handlers will be better than lock. thank for your response.xfs is really an excellent; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01602.html (9,075 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]