Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tar\s+xfs\s+problem\s+\?\s+was\:\s+Re\:\s+xfs

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*tar\s+xfs\s+problem\s+\?\s+was\:\s+Re\:\s+xfs_fsr\s+broken\s+again\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. tar xfs problem ? was: Re: xfs_fsr broken again? (score: 1): Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:47:37 +0200; unstable box...; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00189.html (12,416 bytes)
2. Re: tar xfs problem ? was: Re: xfs_fsr broken again? (score: 1): Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:05:48 +0200; .engr.sgi.com:/; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00191.html (10,687 bytes)
3. Re: tar xfs problem ? was: Re: xfs_fsr broken again? (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 08 Oct 2002 10:20:52 -0500; fs-Partition...; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00192.html (11,068 bytes)
4. oken again? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:47:37 +0200; ybe; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00968.html (12,416 bytes)
5. oken again? (score: 1): Author: h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:05:48 +0200; y, right? ;-) cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00970.html (10,687 bytes)
6. ken again? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 08 Oct 2002 10:20:52 -0500; *cough* -- those would be the packages I built on my (debian/unstable) laptop just yesterday, right? ;-) It seems to be a problem, when building those debian packages on a xfs-Partition...; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00971.html (11,068 bytes)
7. tar xfs problem ? was: Re: xfs_fsr broken again? (score: 1): Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:47:37 +0200; check from *cough* -- those would be the packages I built on my (debian/unstable) laptop just yesterday, right? ;-) It seems to be a problem, when building those debian packages on a xfs-Partition...; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01747.html (12,427 bytes)
8. Re: tar xfs problem ? was: Re: xfs_fsr broken again? (score: 1): Author: Christian Guggenberger <christian.guggenberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 16:05:48 +0200; check from *cough* -- those would be the packages I built on my (debian/unstable) laptop just yesterday, right? ;-) It seems to be a problem, when building those debian packages on a xfs-Partition...; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01749.html (10,952 bytes)
9. Re: tar xfs problem ? was: Re: xfs_fsr broken again? (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 08 Oct 2002 10:20:52 -0500; The length of a symlink appears to be getting messed up. I will take a look since I made some changes in this area recently. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01750.html (11,238 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]