- 1. re: return for thank and more question (score: 1)
- Author: "Seungsoo Lee" <yiseungsu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 02:02:01 +0900
- looking at the wrong disk and/or partition xfs_repair should find any valid superblocks on the partition if there is any. try this
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00245.html (7,916 bytes)
- 2. re: return for thank and more question (score: 1)
- Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Oct 2002 12:45:42 -0500
- readonly filesystem. XFS: write access
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00249.html (8,504 bytes)
- 3. re: return for thank and more question (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Oct 2002 16:13:30 -0500
- have no idea what the problem might be... -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI,
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00258.html (8,154 bytes)
- 4. (score: 1)
- Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 02:02:01 +0900
- cross a lot of extents, removing a file with a large number of extents takes longer than a file with only
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01024.html (7,916 bytes)
- 5. hard with xfs filesystem. (score: 1)
- Author: s-p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Oct 2002 12:45:42 -0500
- any. try this
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01028.html (8,504 bytes)
- 6. corruption cases (score: 1)
- Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Oct 2002 16:13:30 -0500
- re checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:129773a linux/fs/xfs/xfsidbg.c - 1.206 - add xalmtrc kdb command
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01037.html (8,154 bytes)
- 7. re: return for thank and more question (score: 1)
- Author: "Seungsoo Lee" <yiseungsu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 02:02:01 +0900
- Dear, Russell Cattelan I really appreciate your graceful message. As you teach me, I do it firstly. But I can't see what you give. ** 0+0 records in 0+0 records out ** I don't know what those means e
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01803.html (7,556 bytes)
- 8. re: return for thank and more question (score: 1)
- Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Oct 2002 12:45:42 -0500
- hmm that is a bad sign. I looks like your drive had died. Check /var/log/messages to see if any drive/controller errors are being reported.
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01807.html (8,589 bytes)
- 9. re: return for thank and more question (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Oct 2002 16:13:30 -0500
- Yep, it looks like any I/O to that drive is failing... same thing from xfs_repair: Phase 1 -find and verify superblock... superblock read failed, offset 0,size 524288, ag 0,rval 0 i.e. it's not sayin
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01816.html (8,268 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu