Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*r8169\s+and\s+tg3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*r8169\s+and\s+tg3\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: .2003@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:39:19 -0500; Brad House wrote: The current in-kernel version of the r8169 driver is v1.2 from RealTek. This is a patch against 2.6.0-test9-bk6 and later kernels that updates the driver to 1.6 from RealTek. Just s; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00337.html (10,022 bytes)
2. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: a" <alexzapatka@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:51:40 -0500; Commenting below: So, what needs to happen is somebody needs to look at the sis190 changes that went in, and apply those same fixes to r8169. Ok, cool. Didn't realize that, if you have a couple of re; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00338.html (10,423 bytes)
3. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:00:01 +0100; Hi Jeff, So here is the bug report: I have a 4-port card with two Broadcom 5704 chips plugged into PCI-X 1 of Tyan S2880 motherboard (the onboard 5704's are disabled) with single Opteron 240 processo; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00341.html (12,062 bytes)
4. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: ch Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 03:01:31 -0800; This smells of interrupt routing issues on this platform.; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00343.html (9,177 bytes)
5. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:58:48 +0100; Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : If no one objects, I can do for r8169 the same thing I did for sis190. Btw the DMA Rx/Tx rework is already in good shape (I rather like seeing Jeff improving (S)ATA; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00345.html (9,659 bytes)
6. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: ter Bieringer <pb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:24:59 -0500; Francois Romieu wrote: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : [...] So, what needs to happen is somebody needs to look at the sis190 changes that went in, and apply those same fixes to r8169. If no one ob; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00395.html (10,553 bytes)
7. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:44:57 +0100; Yes r8169 can be interesting... I played with it a bit from my head the sending performance was about 900 kpps (pktgen) and RX very OK too about 780 kpps with just dropping the skb instead of doing n; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00399.html (10,038 bytes)
8. r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:39:19 -0500; Brad House wrote: The current in-kernel version of the r8169 driver is v1.2 from RealTek. This is a patch against 2.6.0-test9-bk6 and later kernels that updates the driver to 1.6 from RealTek. Just s; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00950.html (10,186 bytes)
9. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 23:51:40 -0500; Commenting below: So, what needs to happen is somebody needs to look at the sis190 changes that went in, and apply those same fixes to r8169. Ok, cool. Didn't realize that, if you have a couple of re; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00951.html (10,595 bytes)
10. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: Jan Oravec <jan.oravec@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:00:01 +0100; Hi Jeff, So here is the bug report: I have a 4-port card with two Broadcom 5704 chips plugged into PCI-X 1 of Tyan S2880 motherboard (the onboard 5704's are disabled) with single Opteron 240 processo; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00954.html (12,153 bytes)
11. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 03:01:31 -0800; This smells of interrupt routing issues on this platform.; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00956.html (9,306 bytes)
12. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 13:58:48 +0100; Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : [...] If no one objects, I can do for r8169 the same thing I did for sis190. Btw the DMA Rx/Tx rework is already in good shape (I rather like seeing Jeff improving (; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00958.html (9,808 bytes)
13. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:24:59 -0500; So, what needs to happen is somebody needs to look at the sis190 changes that went in, and apply those same fixes to r8169. If no one objects, I can do for r8169 the same thing I did for sis190. Btw; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01008.html (10,610 bytes)
14. Re: r8169 and tg3 (score: 1): Author: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:44:57 +0100; Yes r8169 can be interesting... I played with it a bit from my head the sending performance was about 900 kpps (pktgen) and RX very OK too about 780 kpps with just dropping the skb instead of doing n; /archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01012.html (10,183 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]