Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*patch\s+howto\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*patch\s+howto\?\?\?\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. wn called from line 1042 of xfs_trans.c (score: 1): Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:29:46 -0500; -- Summary|xfs_force_shutdown using NFS|xfs_force_shutdown in -- You are receiving this mail because: --; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00668.html (7,961 bytes)
2. line 1042 of xfs_trans.c (score: 1): Author: ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 28 Oct 2002 15:44:58 -0600; 7),0x8) called from line 1042 of file xfs_trans.c. Return address = 0xc01b2a55 Oct 28 10:28:04 flood kern; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00669.html (8,872 bytes)
3. ts of my last question... (score: 1): Author: wig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:06:54 +0000; I a running RH 7.2 - using the XFS 2.4.9-31 I would like to update these systems to 2.4.18-17.7, and need to merge in the XFS bits. Does anyone know of a good howto to patc; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00671.html (8,924 bytes)
4. estion (score: 1): Author: wig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:19:10 -0500; atching Red Hat (or other vendor kernels) is tough, and non-trivial. In general, you only want to use a patch against the codebase it was generated from. We have patches against "vanilla" linux kern; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00673.html (8,509 bytes)
5. patch howto??? (score: 1): Author: ov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:19:57 +0100; ive it a try. Christoph Hellwig wrote: Note that 2.4.18-17.7x is also the recommend errata kernel ofor RH7.x, so if you want RedHat's latest updates _and_ XFS use the kernel; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00676.html (9,665 bytes)
6. 2 (score: 1): Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:40:37 +0000; illy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx D; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00714.html (9,437 bytes)
7. FW: unlink deadlock (score: 1): Author: ice <pniiice@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:14:17 -0500; e kernel are built with gcc 3.2 - if you build the pcmcia modules (or any other kernel module) with gcc 2.96 you'll get struct mismatches. OTOH I'm not even sure whether there; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00717.html (8,022 bytes)
8. ome diagnosis? (score: 1): Author: rtick.ballenger@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:02:04 -0500; es and try to fit in the XFS 1.2-pre2 or c; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00727.html (10,144 bytes)
9. uff (score: 1): Author: .Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:14:16 +0100; ced a disk to find out. :) [root@lite root]# mkfs.xfs /dev/sda1 mkfs.xfs: /dev/sda1 appears to contain a partition table (Sun). mkfs.xfs: Use the -f option to force overwrite; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00750.html (9,740 bytes)
10. shutdown called from line 1042 of xfs_trans.c (score: 1): Author: edgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:29:46 -0500; Oct 28 10:28:04 flood kernel: xfs_force_shutdown(sd(8,17),0x8) called from line; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01447.html (7,961 bytes)
11. from line 1042 of xfs_trans.c (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: 28 Oct 2002 15:44:58 -0600; news is that this seems to be fairly repeatable, and we should be able to find a; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01448.html (8,872 bytes)
12. log formatting code (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 22:06:54 +0000; down using NFS|xfs_force_shutdown in -- You are receiving this mail because: --; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01450.html (8,924 bytes)
13. own in xfs_trans_cancel (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:19:10 -0500; ),0x8) called from line 1042 of file xfs_trans.c. Return address = 0xc01b2a55 Oct 28 10:28:04 flood kern; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01452.html (8,509 bytes)
14. rom line 1042 of xfs_trans.c (score: 1): Author: os@xxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 08:19:57 +0100; vendor kernels) is tough, and non-trivial. In general, you only want to use a patch against the codebase it was generated from. We have patches against "vanilla" linux kern; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01455.html (9,665 bytes)
15. ck device error handling fixes (score: 1): Author: g <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 16:40:37 +0000; in the world and the name of Silicon Graphics BioInformatics keeps coming up as a top project in; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01493.html (9,437 bytes)
16. f stuff (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 13:14:17 -0500; Not quite sure why I changed it the way I did a long time ago, but the loop in xfs which flushes inodes to disk could well skip the last inode. Thanks to ASANO Masahiro for pointing this out. The fol; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01496.html (8,022 bytes)
17. (score: 1): Author: ATRICK (HP-USA,ex1)" <partick.ballenger@xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:02:04 -0500; torage driver lik; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01506.html (10,144 bytes)
18. e: Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 11:14:16 +0100; s.xfs does write to block 0 of the partition, so if something else is trying to live there... -Eric; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01529.html (9,740 bytes)
19. patch howto??? (score: 1): Author: "Joe St.Clair" <ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:29:46 -0500; I have a couple of systems I a running RH 7.2 - using the XFS 2.4.9-31 kernel I would like to update these systems to 2.4.18-17.7, and need to merge in the XFS bits. Does anyone know of a good howto; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02226.html (7,885 bytes)
20. Re: patch howto??? (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 28 Oct 2002 15:44:58 -0600; Patching Red Hat (or other vendor kernels) is tough, and non-trivial. In general, you only want to use a patch against the codebase it was generated from. We have patches against "vanilla" linux kern; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02227.html (8,961 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]