Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mkfs\.xfs\s+destoroys\s+sun\s+disklabel\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*mkfs\.xfs\s+destoroys\s+sun\s+disklabel\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. buf stuff (score: 1): Author: angeli <andrea@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:13:18 +0900; s not mak; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00742.html (8,358 bytes)
2. uff (score: 1): Author: suo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:33:04 -0600 (CST); careful wh; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00743.html (9,673 bytes)
3. n anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1): Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:41:34 +1100; ay want to try again with such new; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00744.html (8,352 bytes)
4. gnosis? (score: 1): Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:08:10 -0800; don't know much about Sun disklabels - where do they live on the disk? mkfs.xfs does write to block 0 of the partition, so if something else is trying to live there... -Eric; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00746.html (7,715 bytes)
5. bel (score: 1): Author: Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:14:47 -0600 (CST); hey live on the disk? mkfs.xfs does write to block 0 of the partition, so if something else is trying to live there... -Eric; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00747.html (8,355 bytes)
6. sun disklabel (score: 1): Author: ov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:00:10 +0100 (CET); d any different assembly (I'm guessing it doesn't). That's not what he said. If you want the VM to write a buffer, you set i; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00749.html (8,247 bytes)
7. on about kernel update (score: 1): Author: drea@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:13:18 +0900; oss now has a complete set of files including all deleted files. Which means it is now possible to check out a tree from any point in time. i.e. cvs -q update -D2001/01/01 -d It is a; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01521.html (8,358 bytes)
8. on about kernel update (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:33:04 -0600 (CST); one ranting. I did submit a patch. I did sumbit helpful to XFS improvement hints and suggestions. On whole I have had only 2 days of looking at the XFS code and thus I cannot be of an; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01522.html (9,673 bytes)
9. a couple other readonly device change remnants (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:41:34 +1100; be of an; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01523.html (8,352 bytes)
10. complete history (score: 1): Author: nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:08:10 -0800; reful wh; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01525.html (7,715 bytes)
11. stuff (score: 1): Author: <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:14:47 -0600 (CST); if you didn't notice anything wrong you can probably ignore it. I will release a new -aa for 2.4.20-rc1 in a few days, you may want to try again with such new; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01526.html (8,355 bytes)
12. Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1): Author: deen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:00:10 +0100 (CET); problem about mkfx.xfs included in xfsprogs-2.3.5. If harddisk has only one partition, mkfx.xfs destoroy its disklabel. Hi; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01528.html (8,247 bytes)
13. mkfs.xfs destoroys sun disklabel (score: 1): Author: Matsuo Hiroshi <matsuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 12:13:18 +0900; Hi, I have linux-2.4.19 with xfs-1.2pre2 running on sparc (sun4m). I've found a problem about mkfx.xfs included in xfsprogs-2.3.5. If harddisk has only one partition, mkfx.xfs destoroy its disklabel.; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02300.html (8,358 bytes)
14. Re: mkfs.xfs destoroys sun disklabel (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:33:04 -0600 (CST); Hi - I don't know much about Sun disklabels - where do they live on the disk? mkfs.xfs does write to block 0 of the partition, so if something else is trying to live there... -Eric; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02301.html (9,703 bytes)
15. Re: mkfs.xfs destoroys sun disklabel (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 13:41:34 +1100; hi there. The -f option means "force" (as in "force" an overwrite, even if a filesystem/disk label signature was detected). I'd be interested to hear whether this correctly detects the Sun label with; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02302.html (8,412 bytes)
16. Re: mkfs.xfs destoroys sun disklabel (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:08:10 -0800; -f -> force if it hurts, then don't do that --cw; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02304.html (7,775 bytes)
17. Re: mkfs.xfs destoroys sun disklabel (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 23:14:47 -0600 (CST); It does work... I sacrificed a disk to find out. :) [root@lite root]# mkfs.xfs /dev/sda1 mkfs.xfs: /dev/sda1 appears to contain a partition table (Sun). mkfs.xfs: Use the -f option to force overwrite; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02305.html (8,411 bytes)
18. Re: mkfs.xfs destoroys sun disklabel (score: 1): Author: Martin Spott <Martin.Spott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 09:00:10 +0100 (CET); The Sun disklabel lives within the first 64 kByte (as I remember from memory) of the disk. Sun UFS excludes this area from being used in purpose not to destroy the label. If you are placing anything; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02307.html (8,299 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]