Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*kernel\s+build\s+issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*kernel\s+build\s+issues\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: Rob Lembree <lembree@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 10 Jul 2001 12:01:59 -0400; Sorry it's taken a while, but here's a synopsis of what was going wrong. I erroneously made the assumption that RedHat 7.1 fixed the gcc kernel problems, but it didn't. Not only do you have to use kg; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg00363.html (13,341 bytes)
2. Re: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: xxx; Date: 10 Jul 2001 12:01:59 -0400; Sorry it's taken a while, but here's a synopsis of what was going wrong. I erroneously made the assumption that RedHat 7.1 fixed the gcc kernel problems, but it didn't. Not only do you have to use kg; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg01654.html (13,341 bytes)
3. kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: Rob Lembree <lembree@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:03:32 -0400; Hi there, I can't seem to build the XFS kernel properly on my RH 7.1 machine. When I can build the bzImage, I can't build the modules (it complains about hex values in the sources). When I adjust the; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01133.html (9,403 bytes)
4. Re: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:25:45 -0500; Which version of gcc are you using? http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#compilersissues -Eric; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01136.html (7,540 bytes)
5. RE: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: s-luppescu@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:32:58 -0500 (CDT); What kernel version are you using? And where did you get the kernel source? I had trouble with the kernel-source RPMs I got from the SGI web site (I think the problem may have been that I didn't do m; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01137.html (8,484 bytes)
6. Re: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:22:43 -0500; Hi, can I suggest you get a newer set of rpms from oss.sgi.com, the latest stuff is here: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/testing/Release-1.0.1-PR3/ This does compile with the redhat compiler; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01141.html (12,125 bytes)
7. RE: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:35:45 +0200 (CEST); The core XFS version in 2.4.2/3 kernels differ somewhat. The story behind this is that in the 2.4.4 ad 5 releases there were patches commited that make XFS more compiler friendly to compilers other t; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01143.html (8,306 bytes)
8. kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: Rob Lembree <lembree@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:03:32 -0400; Hi there, I can't seem to build the XFS kernel properly on my RH 7.1 machine. When I can build the bzImage, I can't build the modules (it complains about hex values in the sources). When I adjust the; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02303.html (9,403 bytes)
9. Re: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:25:45 -0500; Which version of gcc are you using? http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#compilersissues -Eric; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02306.html (7,540 bytes)
10. RE: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: s-luppescu@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:32:58 -0500 (CDT); What kernel version are you using? And where did you get the kernel source? I had trouble with the kernel-source RPMs I got from the SGI web site (I think the problem may have been that I didn't do m; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02307.html (8,484 bytes)
11. Re: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:22:43 -0500; Hi, can I suggest you get a newer set of rpms from oss.sgi.com, the latest stuff is here: ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/testing/Release-1.0.1-PR3/ This does compile with the redhat compiler; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02311.html (12,125 bytes)
12. RE: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:35:45 +0200 (CEST); The core XFS version in 2.4.2/3 kernels differ somewhat. The story behind this is that in the 2.4.4 ad 5 releases there were patches commited that make XFS more compiler friendly to compilers other t; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg02313.html (8,306 bytes)
13. Re: kernel build issues (score: 1): Author: Rob Lembree <lembree@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 10 Jul 2001 12:01:59 -0400; Sorry it's taken a while, but here's a synopsis of what was going wrong. I erroneously made the assumption that RedHat 7.1 fixed the gcc kernel problems, but it didn't. Not only do you have to use kg; /archives/xfs/2001-07/msg02945.html (13,491 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]