Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*info\s+and\s+feedback\s+XFS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*info\s+and\s+feedback\s+XFS\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Dino A Amato <daamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:38:03 -0400; We have been using the Linux XFS on some machines here and it works great! A project is going to be started and I wanted to get some feedback before we start. The project will entail 2 - Quad Proc b; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00555.html (8,154 bytes)
2. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:12:08 +0200; We have been using the Linux XFS on some machines here and it works great! A project is going to be started and I wanted to get some feedback before we start. The project will entail 2 - Quad Proc bo; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00556.html (9,399 bytes)
3. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:23:08 +1000; 4 is fine. People are working on a new release of XFS, against current Redhat. Or you can use the XFS CVS tree which is up to 2.4.6-pre3. Getting it into the source tree depends on Linus's response.; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00557.html (8,250 bytes)
4. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Dino A Amato <daamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:27:06 -0400; Thanks responding so quick! In the FAQ's it mentioned maybe June: "are still some points (mid june) that need to be resolved before it can be sent to Linus. Maybe if we are lucky it might even be in; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00558.html (10,203 bytes)
5. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:48:54 +0200; Thanks responding so quick! In the FAQ's it mentioned maybe June: "are still some points (mid june) that need to be resolved before it can be sent to Linus. Maybe if we are lucky it might even be inc; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00560.html (8,893 bytes)
6. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:03:55 +1200 (NZST); ... not to mention the limitations of the Intel architecture itself. -- Juha; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00584.html (7,884 bytes)
7. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:45:22 +0200 (CEST); The <insert arch here> scales better then intel x86 systems. where number of arch > 5 A cobalt Qube2 is based on mips, not fast but it usses low power and can move a good amount of data. I believe Er; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00586.html (8,549 bytes)
8. info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Dino A Amato <daamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:38:03 -0400; We have been using the Linux XFS on some machines here and it works great! A project is going to be started and I wanted to get some feedback before we start. The project will entail 2 - Quad Proc b; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01725.html (8,154 bytes)
9. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:12:08 +0200; We have been using the Linux XFS on some machines here and it works great! A project is going to be started and I wanted to get some feedback before we start. The project will entail 2 - Quad Proc bo; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01726.html (9,399 bytes)
10. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:23:08 +1000; 4 is fine. People are working on a new release of XFS, against current Redhat. Or you can use the XFS CVS tree which is up to 2.4.6-pre3. Getting it into the source tree depends on Linus's response.; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01727.html (8,250 bytes)
11. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Dino A Amato <daamato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:27:06 -0400; Thanks responding so quick! In the FAQ's it mentioned maybe June: "are still some points (mid june) that need to be resolved before it can be sent to Linus. Maybe if we are lucky it might even be in; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01728.html (10,203 bytes)
12. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:48:54 +0200; Thanks responding so quick! In the FAQ's it mentioned maybe June: "are still some points (mid june) that need to be resolved before it can be sent to Linus. Maybe if we are lucky it might even be inc; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01730.html (8,893 bytes)
13. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Juha Saarinen <juha@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 09:03:55 +1200 (NZST); ... not to mention the limitations of the Intel architecture itself. -- Juha; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01754.html (7,884 bytes)
14. Re: info and feedback XFS (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:45:22 +0200 (CEST); The <insert arch here> scales better then intel x86 systems. where number of arch > 5 A cobalt Qube2 is based on mips, not fast but it usses low power and can move a good amount of data. I believe Er; /archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01756.html (8,549 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]