Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*direct\s+io\s+on\s+linux\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*direct\s+io\s+on\s+linux\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. direct io on linux (score: 1): Author: Gabor Forgacs <gabor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:02:04 +0200; Hi all What are the possibilities to use direct io on linux with any filesystem ? I use xfs/O_DIRECT under irix, i am just wondering is the direct io is a viable solution under linux too. Generally w; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00018.html (6,907 bytes)
2. Re: direct io on linux (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Oct 2002 10:05:57 -0500; If you are reading a lot of files and only reading them once, then O_DIRECT would be your best bet. You should do some timing tests though. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engine; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00019.html (7,776 bytes)
3. re: direct io on linux (score: 1): Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:25:39 -0400; I don't know about xfs/linux or any other common linux FS, but I _assume_ the newly GPLed FS from Oracle (OCFS) supports O_DIRECT. http://ocfs.otncast.otnxchange.oracle.com/servlets/ProjectHome Unfo; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00021.html (7,627 bytes)
4. Re: direct io on linux (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:15:33 +0200; O_DIRECT doesn't do any readahead to keep the disk streaming so unless you're doing it yourself (e.g. by using multiple threads or aio) normal IO will be likely faster. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00022.html (7,607 bytes)
5. and XFS? (score: 1): Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:02:04 +0200; repairing a broken xfs partitition. According to the FAQ at oss.sgi.com I should ask the list for help since the problem is known as a rare one and hard to debug[1]. The xfs; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00797.html (6,907 bytes)
6. d XFS? (score: 1): Author: <gabor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Oct 2002 10:05:57 -0500; oblem is that whenever RedHat creates an errata kernel, it has to be rebuilt with XFS support. I'm sure they _will_ finally include XFS, at least the way they did it with Re; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00798.html (7,776 bytes)
7. d XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:25:39 -0400; bilities to use direct io on linux with any filesystem ? I use xfs/O_DIRECT under irix, i am just wondering is the direct io is a viable solution under linux too. Generally w; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00800.html (7,627 bytes)
8. ntinues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: myer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:15:33 +0200; of files and only reading them once, then O_DIRECT would be your best bet. You should do some timing tests though. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engine; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00801.html (7,607 bytes)
9. direct io on linux (score: 1): Author: Gabor Forgacs <gabor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:02:04 +0200; Hi all What are the possibilities to use direct io on linux with any filesystem ? I use xfs/O_DIRECT under irix, i am just wondering is the direct io is a viable solution under linux too. Generally w; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01576.html (6,907 bytes)
10. Re: direct io on linux (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 02 Oct 2002 10:05:57 -0500; If you are reading a lot of files and only reading them once, then O_DIRECT would be your best bet. You should do some timing tests though. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engine; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01577.html (7,840 bytes)
11. re: direct io on linux (score: 1): Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 11:25:39 -0400; I don't know about xfs/linux or any other common linux FS, but I _assume_ the newly GPLed FS from Oracle (OCFS) supports O_DIRECT. http://ocfs.otncast.otnxchange.oracle.com/servlets/ProjectHome Unfo; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01579.html (7,642 bytes)
12. Re: direct io on linux (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 17:15:33 +0200; O_DIRECT doesn't do any readahead to keep the disk streaming so unless you're doing it yourself (e.g. by using multiple threads or aio) normal IO will be likely faster. -Andi; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01580.html (7,671 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]