Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*advice\:\s+3ware\+raid\+xfs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*advice\:\s+3ware\+raid\+xfs\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Gaspar Bakos <gbakos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:51:31 -0500 (EST); Some time ago I asked for advice regarding a 3ware + raid setup on XFS, and I got a LOT of help, such as - what kind of RAID is recommended, - be careful with WD drives, - use LVM2 + XFS, etc. Final; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00208.html (7,888 bytes)
2. RE: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Young" <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:42:41 -0800; Hi Gaspar, I would certainly be sure to use the external journal. In order to do this with our 3Ware RAID-5, take the resulting RAID (say /dev/sda) and partition it with sda1 being around 256MB. Then; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00209.html (8,491 bytes)
3. RE: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:01:46 +0100; At 21:42 14-1-2004 -0800, Mike Young wrote: Hi Gaspar, I would certainly be sure to use the external journal. In order to do this with our 3Ware RAID-5, take the resulting RAID (say /dev/sda) and par; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00211.html (8,495 bytes)
4. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Gaspar Bakos <gbakos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:51:31 -0500 (EST); art; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00574.html (7,888 bytes)
5. RE: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Young" <myoung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:42:41 -0800; nal; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00575.html (8,491 bytes)
6. RE: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:01:46 +0100; n 5; /archives/xfs/2004-01/msg00577.html (8,495 bytes)
7. advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Gaspar Bakos <gbakos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:14:57 -0500 (EST); Dear all, I am about to build a system for data reduction, but before I do so, I thought of posting this in case anyone has useful hints (don't do that!, or be careful with...) It would be a dual xeo; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00104.html (8,873 bytes)
8. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:23:16 -0700; Gaspar Bakos wrote: XFS on them. My possibilities are: (I need total space more than 500Gb) 1. JBOD, each disk one partition (drawback: I have to take care of not filling either of them) This will be; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00105.html (9,560 bytes)
9. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:21:30 -0500 (EST); FWIW, I'm running XFS 1.3.1 on a 3Ware card, with mirrored 80GB WD drives. I've run into absolutely no problems. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpou; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00106.html (10,327 bytes)
10. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Michael Loftis <mloftis@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 15:28:08 -0700; Depending on your 3Ware card, try to create a RAID with 128K or 256K stripes....128K is the 'normal' blocking factor the kernel uses when combining reads and writes. Presuming you're doing mostly seq; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00107.html (10,855 bytes)
11. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Feizhou <feizhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 12:54:01 +0800; Gaspar Bakos wrote: Dear all, I am about to build a system for data reduction, but before I do so, I thought of posting this in case anyone has useful hints (don't do that!, or be careful with...) It; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00109.html (9,454 bytes)
12. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Mike Burger <mburger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 07:28:08 -0500 (EST); What kind of "funny things" have you seen with WD drives? -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org:2000 To; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00114.html (9,124 bytes)
13. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 07:58:12 -0500 (EST); Some (and I forget what models are being discussed here) have a tendency to disappear when used in RAID type situations. Discussed here: http://wdc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wdc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.ph; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00115.html (8,831 bytes)
14. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Danny Cox <danscox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 07 Dec 2003 13:55:36 -0500; You really should consider 2.4.23, or at least apply the patch to do_brk() that 2.4.23 fixed. Of course, if this is a stand-alone machine with no other logins, you may not care. Either I'm getting m; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00134.html (8,873 bytes)
15. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 23:19:11 -0900; logins don't matter, if its connected to a network and runs any service it needs to be patched. gentoo was not compromised with a local login, someone got uid=rsyncd via rsync then used the kernel to; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00136.html (9,549 bytes)
16. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:40:52 +0100; At 12:14 7-12-2003 -0500, Gaspar Bakos wrote: Dear all, I am about to build a system for data reduction, but before I do so, I thought of posting this in case anyone has useful hints (don't do that!,; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00141.html (10,355 bytes)
17. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author: Gaspar Bakos <gbakos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 12:27:39 -0500 (EST); RE: Yes, it is the 4-port one. Maybe, once upon a time when I get more funded, I will get 8-port card(s). The read/write is approx equal, maybe 'read' a little bit more. (I wonder, in long-term, how; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00148.html (9,313 bytes)
18. advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:14:57 -0500 (EST); Dear all, I am about to build a system for data reduction, but before I do so, I thought of posting this in case anyone has useful hints (don't do that!, or be careful with...) It would be a dual xeo; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00485.html (8,873 bytes)
19. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 10:23:16 -0700; Gaspar Bakos wrote: XFS on them. My possibilities are: (I need total space more than 500Gb) 1. JBOD, each disk one partition (drawback: I have to take care of not filling either of them) This will be; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00486.html (9,560 bytes)
20. Re: advice: 3ware+raid+xfs (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:21:30 -0500 (EST); FWIW, I'm running XFS 1.3.1 on a 3Ware card, with mirrored 80GB WD drives. I've run into absolutely no problems. -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org Visit the Dog Pound II BBS telnet://dogpou; /archives/xfs/2003-12/msg00487.html (10,327 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]