Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Xfs_force_shutdown\s+on\s+recent\s+XFS\s+CVS\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: "Hardy I.D." <I.D.Hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:55:56 +0100
機會您不來試試嗎徵全省打拼夥伴。 天大的好消息! 如果從便利商店出來ㄉ人;都跟您有關係。目前全省已有40家店面;您不必出管銷;每家10人就好ㄌ;10人*40元(就像過路費)*40家=16000元這樣ㄉ收入。 不要您ㄉ加盟金與保證金;只要您柴米油鹽醬醋茶
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00216.html (8,937 bytes)

2. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Oct 2002 12:23:43 -0500
;10人*40元(就像過路費)*40家=16000元這樣ㄉ收入。 不要您ㄉ加盟金與保證金;只要您柴米油鹽醬醋茶
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00217.html (9,436 bytes)

3. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: <I.D.Hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:31:45 +0100 (BST)
h tests keep running OK, but one of my other machines has some corruption. It has other changes in the kernel which could be the ca
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00222.html (22,977 bytes)

4. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Oct 2002 19:19:08 -0500
file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:129660a linux/fs/xfs/xfsidbg.c - 1.205
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00223.html (27,552 bytes)

5. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:50:50 -0700
something going on in the endian swapping code which is inefficient. we do call down to the kernel primitives that networking uses
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00226.html (8,255 bytes)

6. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: <I.D.Hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:32:14 +0100 (BST)
or SGI_XFS_1.2. As I undestand it is is o the RedHat 8.0 kernel (2.4.18-14) with o missing ACL/Quota bits and o XFS-CVS from 30th se
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00234.html (8,726 bytes)

7. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: <I.D.Hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:32:25 +0100 (BST)
is a bad sign. I looks like your drive had died. Check /var/log/messages to see if any drive/controller errors are being reported.
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00251.html (20,080 bytes)

8. is a expected behavior (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:55:56 +0100
ome place that the Powered by XFS image file (that is in the RedHat 7.3 installer) is available for download? I would like to make a miniture and put it on my website (hopefully coming in a
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00995.html (8,937 bytes)

9. ease avaliable (score: 1)
Author: <I.D.Hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Oct 2002 12:23:43 -0500
s device flush ioctl; sync with kernel source. CONTRIBUTED: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx> The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: xfs-cm
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00996.html (9,436 bytes)

10. yte ordered (score: 1)
Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:31:45 +0100 (BST)
after reboot, then run check. The in memory corruption error means it failed an internal check on a memor
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01001.html (22,977 bytes)

11. ry extents host byte ordered (score: 1)
Author: <I.D.Hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Oct 2002 19:19:08 -0500
to a host byte order representation. The internal extents are read in once, then modified seperately from
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01002.html (27,552 bytes)

12. nt XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: hen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:50:50 -0700
: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:129660a linux/fs/xfs/xfsidbg.c - 1.205
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01005.html (8,255 bytes)

13. _XFS_1.2a1] root xfs filesystem executable bits bug comeback? (score: 1)
Author: RUSU <dizzy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:32:14 +0100 (BST)
ve come back. An XFS root mounted partition returns always true on all files with "test -x". Non-root mount
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01013.html (8,726 bytes)

14. ons async (score: 1)
Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 14:32:25 +0100 (BST)
ive. ** 0+0 records in 0+0 records out ** I don't know what those means e
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01030.html (20,080 bytes)

15. Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: "Hardy I.D." <I.D.Hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 15:55:56 +0100
Hi, Yesterday I rebooted a server with a recent XFS CVS (downloaded/compiled Tuesday of this week; the kernel reports at boot time - 'SGI XFS CVS-10/08/02:05 with quota, no debug enabled'. Since then
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01774.html (8,937 bytes)

16. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Oct 2002 12:23:43 -0500
Ian, did you run xfs_check and repair before mounting the fs or after? You should mount again after reboot, then run check. The in memory corruption error means it failed an internal check on a memor
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01775.html (9,528 bytes)

17. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: <I.D.Hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 23:31:45 +0100 (BST)
Steve, thanks as always for your reply. Yes, the server was rebooted, and the filesystem mounted and unmounted prior to running xfs_check/repair. Also, a 'xfs_fsr' was run when we upgraded the kernel
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01780.html (23,089 bytes)

18. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Oct 2002 19:19:08 -0500
Hmm, you have ascii data on top of inodes by the look of it. So this looks like a rogue write. You have 64 inodes here which look like they were completely overwritten. Working out where this came fr
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01781.html (27,695 bytes)

19. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:50:50 -0700
What kind of RAM (and how much)? ECC? --cw
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01784.html (8,347 bytes)

20. Re: Xfs_force_shutdown on recent XFS CVS (score: 1)
Author: <I.D.Hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 07:32:14 +0100 (BST)
Quoting Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>: Registered ECC, 1Gbyte on a SuperMicro 370DLE Motherboard with 2 Pentium III processors. Ian
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01792.html (8,832 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu